#5828719

jbscotchman

2020-09-11 18:56

Good, but WD's SN550 is still the value king for NVME.

#5828730

TheDeeGee

2020-09-11 19:22

Came across this the other day. [youtube=YWtspZqOxAM]

#5828763

Mufflore

2020-09-11 20:58

The results on Page 10 have no legends to say what is being measured, in the text or images. ie data transfer or time There is nothing to suggest whether higher or lower is better. While obvious to us tech nerds, others may not know. Luckily its the page that matters least, the results are close.

#5828858

fry178

2020-09-12 06:01

Not sure if this makes really sense. I can get the same performance (most time same controller) for 100$ or less, or "faster" drives for 120-130$

#5828888

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2020-09-12 09:00

Mufflore:

The results on Page 10 have no legends to say what is being measured, in the text or images. ie data transfer or time There is nothing to suggest whether higher or lower is better.

Hmm, valid remark. I will look into adding these for future reviews, thanks.

#5828903

DangerousQQ

2020-09-12 10:27

great review, but is there problems with the second paragraph on page 1. "Now in the year 2018???" All the data in that paragraph looks like its been lifted from a 2 year old review. Sub $200 dollars for a 500GB, hmmm I paid less than £200 for a 2TB. Can you please update this paragraph to reflect current state of play?

#5829672

Robbo9999

2020-09-14 20:32

Seems like the fact there was no write hole combined with the high 4K QD1 read performance might be quite a nice real world practical performer....it probably punches above it's weight vs it's more obvious spec performance numbers that are kinda underwhelming. (I haven't included comparative price as a factor though, because might not be good value for the price, I'm just talking about the performance.)