GeForce RTX 4090 twice as fast as RTX 3090 uses 450W (16128 Cores) Arrives in July?
Click here to post a comment for GeForce RTX 4090 twice as fast as RTX 3090 uses 450W (16128 Cores) Arrives in July? on our message forum
Clouseau
TheDeeGee
The EVGA 3090 uses 450 watts as well, so no raise in TDP.
Spets
https://i.giphy.com/media/xT0xez4eXNeIZ3x4qs/giphy.webp
Undying
Just like 3080 was twice as fast as 2080
https://www.linkpicture.com/q/NVIDIA-GeForce-RTX-30-Series-Graphics-Cards_Announcement_GeForce-RTX-3090_RTX-3080_RTX-3070_13-1.png
https://www.linkpicture.com/q/geforce_rtx_3080_computerbase_01.png
rl66
No the EVGA 3090 can use until 450w by it's extra conception but is still a 350w GPU...
This one is a 450w from base.
In real life the 4090 will consume more evergy than your 3090 due to this.
So, now that crypto are on ground, NVidia found gaming customer interesting ???
Dragam1337
No, official TDP for 3090 is 350.
alanm
OC'd AIB cards might be close to 600w.
Dragam1337
Not entirely comparable - 2080 is not based on the big chip, where as 3080 is... and as such the 3080 fares much better at 4k and above.
My guess is that in real life performance at 4k the 4090 will be 60ish % faster than the 3090.
AuerX
Should be good times 🙂
Sylencer
Twice as expensive, if anything.
Ricepudding
Considering the massive increases to the electric bill, I think this is a terrible product. and deaf from nvidia with the sore in these prices (I know its a halo product but will also mean the rest of the stack could also be higher in power draw as well)
want something lower in watts not higher, as this will easily do 500-550w if its anything like the 3090
Crazy Joe
That depends on which EVGA 3090 you have. Only the FTW3 cards have 3 8-pin power connectors. My EVGA RTX3090 XC3 Ultra only has two 8-pin power connectors, so that should not be drawing more than 375 Watt (if it doesn't exceed the PCI-E specs).
mackintosh
I'll settle for a 4070, should be a sufficient upgrade.
geogan
https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/1341517377274_684319.png
Astyanax
4090ti = 550
4090 = 450
4080 = 360
4070ti = 290
4070 = 220
4060 =150
Undying
So Ada is more efficient than Ampere? Every single rumor so far pointed it out thats not the case.
Astyanax
rumors are sharing clock validation results for a fully enabled chip being pushed to its highest, i never took them as being an indication of what the products based on them would use.
AD104 as a fully enabled part is 290-300ish w, like the GA104 when paired with GDDR6x (the 3070ti)
AD104 when paired with GDDR6, and not fully enabled is 210-220w, clocked at at a 2.4ghz target
the only card that has directly linked a tgp to a sku is the 3090.
AD103 is an unknown, it'll be used by the 3080 but not sure if it will be cut back or used in full and the 3080ti will end up on a cut down AD102 o_O
Denial
Every single rumor so far has contradicted some other rumor including this one. It's all just bullshit afaic. I don't care who is leaking.
XenthorX
With my overclocked 3090 I'm consistently around 440W, but every retail 3090 owner has to flash a bios to reach this.
3090 were hold back by their power limit imo.
yosef019
what 3080 asus goes more than 400W with 121% power
