#4562594

Assassino

2013-03-26 14:07

Nice, though it practically is just a GTX 660 with 192 fewer CUDA cores.. I hope they price this really good seeing that the prices of the GTX 660 have gone down now..

#4562685

aless83

2013-03-26 15:46

2 of these in SLI should be a sweet spot for 300€

#4562723

Undying

2013-03-26 16:35

2 of these in SLI should be a sweet spot for 300€

For 300€ you can get yourself a GTX670.

#4562741

joe87

2013-03-26 17:08

wew.. i just brought gtx 660 D:

#4562887

mohiuddin

2013-03-26 19:29

Everything is very good except the power consumption. Hope the price will be made right.

#4562899

labidas

2013-03-26 19:39

clock to clock a HD7850 is still faster, takes less power and costs the same.

#4562926

aless83

2013-03-26 19:56

For 300€ you can get yourself a GTX670.

I have a feeling 2 650ti-boost will be faster

#4562981

BLEH!

2013-03-26 20:57

Seems a bit thirsty when you compare it with the 7790.

#4563308

dkizzy

2013-03-27 04:23

I'm sure AMD will release another flavor with 2 GB. I would have liked to have seen the 1gb model pitted next to the 1gb 7790 to see how much the memory available impacted the comparison.

#4563457

LesserHellspawn

2013-03-27 11:22

Interesting card, really. Much closer to the 660 in the benches than the 660ti is to the 670. Overclock it and you've basically made the 660 obsolete.

#4563464

yasamoka

2013-03-27 11:47

Interesting card, really. Much closer to the 660 in the benches than the 660ti is to the 670. Overclock it and you've basically made the 660 obsolete.

Orrrr overclock the 660 as well.

#4563611

Assassino

2013-03-27 15:08

Seeing that the 650 Ti Boost is a 660 with less CUDA cores, this just proves that a difference of 192 CUDAs does make a difference 😀