GeForce GTX 1080 Photos (updated)

#5268692

sammarbella

2016-05-07 14:04

Back plate in two parts? :3eyes:

#5268697

XenthorX

2016-05-07 14:09

The single 8 pin is so impressive, thanks for the nice pictures!

#5268735

Spets

2016-05-07 15:02

Thanks for the pictures Hilbert!

#5268752

DeskStar

2016-05-07 15:24

Now we can "assume" that there will be a more power hungry version possibly branded the Ti.....?? I like the low power consumption, but would like the ability to throw as much as I want to at it. I like what I've seen so far......., but am not sure that I'll be selling off the OG TITAN's just yet. Not sure, but 3rd party board makers can always add their own "Powah" to their particular setups right...?? Could not imagine having a couple of these cards with the ability to throw much more power at it right out of the box.

#5268780

Turanis

2016-05-07 16:41

Thanks,but no thanks. What we see there is only the cover,not what's inside. 😀 Btw the Card is too long!!!Because of GDDR5 or GDDR5X??? Wait for Hbm or Hbm2 cards,I know will be expensive but woth it. Hope to see soon the specs and benches.

#5268795

xIcarus

2016-05-07 17:09

Back plate in two parts? :3eyes:

Yeah, wth is up with the 2-piece backplate O.o?

#5268844

MBTP

2016-05-07 18:42

NOTE: HDMI 2.0b is less complete than HDMI2.0a, it can't provide 4k 60hz with 4:4:4. Not 10 bit nor 12 bit. http://www.hdfever.fr/2013/11/14/tableau-comparatif-hdmi-1-4-vs-hdmi-2-0a-vs-hdmi-2-0b/ So for Pascal 4k 60hz 4:4:4 you will need to use display ports out.

#5268852

Reddoguk

2016-05-07 18:56

I'm looking forward to the 2.5Ghz overclocked monster 3rd party cards. I'm betting 2.5ghz is possible with the really high end binned chips. A reference card from Nvidia that boosts to 21-2200mhz which is way over the estimated 1800mhz. My 980 G1 has this same behavior as it says 1329 but mine boosts to over 1400mhz without any overclocks. No where near that 1080 but maybe they used only really high ASIC cards.

#5268901

harkinsteven

2016-05-07 20:33

Does anyone want to buy 980 SLI? £210 per card! haha. I'm def getting me a 1080.

#5268905

Caesar

2016-05-07 20:38

That' s the best part of you Hilbert .... You keep us updated..... Awesome....

#5268954

Primey0

2016-05-07 22:37

The cooler design leak made it seem more edgy and ugly but it's actually quit nice IMO

#5268958

Margolis

2016-05-07 22:49

Any news on when we can expect a review?

#5268985

XenthorX

2016-05-07 23:37

Now we can "assume" that there will be a more power hungry version possibly branded the Ti.....?? I like the low power consumption, but would like the ability to throw as much as I want to at it. I like what I've seen so far......., but am not sure that I'll be selling off the OG TITAN's just yet. Not sure, but 3rd party board makers can always add their own "Powah" to their particular setups right...?? Could not imagine having a couple of these cards with the ability to throw much more power at it right out of the box.

Again, the only reason we had a 980-Ti was to answer Fury-X. With Polaris 10 maybe not even matching 1070, they'll probably release a 1060-Ti yeah...

#5268987

sammarbella

2016-05-07 23:42

Again, the only reason we had a 980-Ti was to answer Fury-X. With Polaris 10 maybe not even matching 1070, they'll probably release a 1060-Ti yeah...

AFIK 980TI was first. Fury X was an AMD release to "fight" the already present 980TI not the other way around.

#5269008

XenthorX

2016-05-08 00:25

AFIK 980TI was first. Fury X was an AMD release to "fight" the already present 980TI not the other way around.

Let's do the work lol: Fury X was released on June 24, 2015. 980-Ti was released on June 2, 2015. Given the time it takes to release such product, R&D etc... , they're both fighting on the same market segment, at the same timeframe. But "Who shot first?", we'll never know indeed. My bet is AMD worked on Fury-X, Nvidia heard of it and brought their cutdown version of Titan-X to compete: 980-Ti. Anyway they at least had both suspicion about the market positionning of their opponent. But here it's pretty clear AMD has nothing in stock to compete with 1080. Not until Vega at least. So why waste money in R&D and Marketing etc... for a 1080-Ti? there would be no point at all.

#5269016

sammarbella

2016-05-08 00:44

Both are on the same segment but 980TI came first.:D I agree: there is no reason for 1080TI if AMD has not a "secret weapon" coming next weeks. Smart move from Nvidia releasing a premium OC version with binned chips. Maybe we'll see a 1080TI after next January (?) GP100 release.

#5269017