First Benchmarks show AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS to be faster than Ryzen 7 2700X and Core i7-9700K

anticupidon

2020-02-12 08:54

What? A mobile CPU outperforms a solid desktop CPU? Am I dreaming? If there is some truth in this, we just didn't realize how deep the rabbit hole goes. Lisa Su sheepish smile during the CES presentation now makes a whole new sense. I can only dream of having an ThinkPad with a behemoth CPU and Vega/Navi graphics. This is big.

#5759480

Undying

2020-02-12 09:19

This is very good i never thought it outperform a desktop 2700, barely though but still faster. Amd is serious about this mobile thing.

#5759484

neikosr0x

2020-02-12 09:44

Undying:

This is very good i never thought it outperform a desktop 2700, barely though but still faster. Amd is serious about this mobile thing.

Well with Intel releasing the same CPU on laptops every year is no surprise. Intel has been milking people every year with the same tech over and over with small improvements and on the laptop department, they are actually fkd because they can't go around increasing TDP with higher core counts or frequencies.

#5759488

Petr V

2020-02-12 10:18

Undying:

This is very good i never thought it outperform a desktop 2700, barely though but still faster. Amd is serious about this mobile thing.

It must be if you look at Intel 14nm crap.

#5759493

blacknova

2020-02-12 11:00

Now I really want DTR laptop with one of these to finally replace my current desktop. If it also would manage to stay silent under high load even better. This CPU + Radeon Pro 5500M, I'll be happy for a while.

#5759501

Loophole35

2020-02-12 11:57

This is my next laptop CPU. I hope the ASUS G14 or G15 will be thunderbolt 3 certified.

#5759509

Nekrosleezer

2020-02-12 12:50

and still maintaining 45w? uffff

#5759510

blacknova

2020-02-12 12:51

Nekrosleezer:

and still maintaining 15w? uffff

No, HS is 35w.

#5759511

Undying

2020-02-12 12:52

blacknova:

No, HS is 35w.

35w chip beating 105w is something.

#5759512

Loophole35

2020-02-12 12:53

Nekrosleezer:

and still maintaining 45w? uffff

blacknova:

No, HS is 35w.

This is TDP not actual power draw. It may consume more or less.

#5759517

Undying

2020-02-12 13:08

Loophole35:

This is TDP not actual power draw. It may consume more or less.

Especially with intel. Its funny how 9900k is 95w, haha.

#5759520

ruthan

2020-02-12 13:22

Its a bit misleading that text is about 45W APU, but on main picture is 15W one. Otherwise nice result.

#5759522

Loophole35

2020-02-12 13:31

Undying:

Especially with intel. Its funny how 9900k is 95w, haha.

My 9900k can be made to stay under 95W and is still a very good CPU for gaming then. The only time you will really see the numbers past that will be sustained 100% workloads and AVX. When gaming at 5.0Ghz on all cores I’m usually around 75-80W.

#5759526

Undying

2020-02-12 13:41

Loophole35:

My 9900k can be made to stay under 95W and is still a very good CPU for gaming then. The only time you will really see the numbers past that will be sustained 100% workloads and AVX. When gaming at 5.0Ghz on all cores I’m usually around 75-80W.

This is a quote from 9900kf guru3d review. "Multi-threaded power consumption was rather high at almost 200 Watts". https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_core_i9_9900k_processor_review,5.html

#5759531

Loophole35

2020-02-12 13:58

Undying:

This is a quote from 9900kf guru3d review. "Multi-threaded power consumption was rather high at almost 200 Watts". https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/intel_core_i9_9900k_processor_review,5.html

Yes that is correct if you actually read my post properly you would see that I even said it goes above it’s rated TDP. The max power draw in the review is with basically a power virus program. Most games will never stress the CPU past it’s rated TDP even at 5Ghz. I know you have an agenda to push and AMD’s checks are finally not bouncing for you but please objectively read posts you quote. Also when Hilbert did his initial review on early BIOS’s the motherboard manufacturers were doing shady things with MCE and ignoring limiters. It’s well documented (and likely directed from Intel).

#5759546

Spider4423

2020-02-12 14:53

Loophole35:

Yes that is correct if you actually read my post properly you would see that I even said it goes above it’s rated TDP. The max power draw in the review is with basically a power virus program. Most games will never stress the CPU past it’s rated TDP even at 5Ghz. I know you have an agenda to push and AMD’s checks are finally not bouncing for you but please objectively read posts you quote. Also when Hilbert did his initial review on early BIOS’s the motherboard manufacturers were doing shady things with MCE and ignoring limiters. It’s well documented (and likely directed from Intel).

Thats not how it works... 🙂

#5759550

Loophole35

2020-02-12 15:05

Spider4423:

Thats not how it works... 🙂

Mind pointing out what is incorrect or are you just here to troll and add nothing of substance?

#5759553

airbud7

2020-02-12 15:15

Spider4423:

Thats not how it works... 🙂

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a84e5b43f1c094fdda291c03a0b1eb3f/tenor.gif?itemid=7666433

#5759559

jbscotchman

2020-02-12 15:38

AMD is definitely not tired of winning.

#5759561

AcidSnow

2020-02-12 15:49

I just built a brand new $1,700 Ryzen (R5 3600) rig 3 months ago, and I'd be feeling pretty foolish if it was trumped by a laptop CPU at just 15W. EDIT: It's a 35W part, but still impressive VS the 65W R5 3600.