EU based Archer 2 supercomputer gets 11696 AMD Epyc CPUs

Published by

Click here to post a comment for EU based Archer 2 supercomputer gets 11696 AMD Epyc CPUs on our message forum
#5721299
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260048.jpg
This is truly Epyc.
#5721302
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/163/163032.jpg
You know AMD is doing well when you see it show up in supercomputers. I really doubt the competition can offer the same amount of compute at the same value, or energy efficiency, or density.
#5721303
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
Well... won't be EU based in two weeks from now. But yeah... bring it on AMD!
#5721310
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254132.jpg
748,544 cores? 😱
#5721313
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/260/260048.jpg
Clawedge:

You know AMD is doing well when you see it show up in supercomputers. I really doubt the competition can offer the same amount of compute at the same value, or energy efficiency, or density.
AMD can't compete in volume.
#5721314
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270017.jpg
The intel guys on some of these thread, between here and the general riff-raff that is wccftech (who's comments are a veritable cess-pit!), would often say "AMD folks be like 'MOAR' cores!" ... No, AMD folks like me have stock and see the MOAR cores in the news headlines like this and be like "MOAR cores = more stock gains" 🙂 I'd still like to see how it runs Crysis... *gets evil eyes from everyone else in the forum* C'mon guys, I had to I had to, No NOT THE THINKER NOT THE THINKER! NO-NONONO!
#5721327
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
And people still wonder why 3900X is so hard to find and 3950X is delayed... 🙄
#5721329
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
theoneofgod:

748,544 cores? 😱
1497088 Threads in the Task-Manager.
#5721331
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220214.jpg
People can't source a single 3900X 12 core CPU for home use while at same time AMD supplies 11,696 64 core CPUs here... I wonder how much money AMD got out of that deal. I'm surprised the fabrication could even produce so many of them actually.
#5721363
data/avatar/default/avatar10.webp
Yes but with a 1080p screen, What about gaming??? :D
#5721393
data/avatar/default/avatar13.webp
bobblunderton:

The intel guys on some of these thread, between here and the general riff-raff that is wccftech (who's comments are a veritable cess-pit!), would often say "AMD folks be like 'MOAR' cores!" ... No, AMD folks like me have stock and see the MOAR cores in the news headlines like this and be like "MOAR cores = more stock gains" 🙂 I'd still like to see how it runs Crysis... *gets evil eyes from everyone else in the forum* C'mon guys, I had to I had to, No NOT THE THINKER NOT THE THINKER! NO-NONONO!
Don't beat yourself up. If you hadn't asked, "Yeah, but will it play Crysis", I was going to.
#5721434
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Like I said before sell that INTEL stock! ;-)
#5721450
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246171.jpg
Eh, I guess that's a lot of cores. I'm not that impressed. /s
#5721484
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268248.jpg
Robson:

1497088 Threads in the Task-Manager.
bobblunderton:

The intel guys on some of these thread, between here and the general riff-raff that is wccftech (who's comments are a veritable cess-pit!), would often say "AMD folks be like 'MOAR' cores!" ... No, AMD folks like me have stock and see the MOAR cores in the news headlines like this and be like "MOAR cores = more stock gains" 🙂 I'd still like to see how it runs Crysis... *gets evil eyes from everyone else in the forum* C'mon guys, I had to I had to, No NOT THE THINKER NOT THE THINKER! NO-NONONO!
Well on 1080p most likely it can run crisis on 1000 fps+++++ on software renderer assuming someone can get it to scale perfectly! Is about 0.75 threads per pixel! :P
#5721492
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/277/277212.jpg
Robson:

1497088 Threads in the Task-Manager.
The task manager won't show all of those because they aren't really "one machine." If it did you would have to scroll for days. Imagine saying, "I want to see what core 48382 is doing..." We had a machine here for a while with two chips, twenty cores each, and hyperthreading. That meant up to eighty threads. Here's what the task manager of W7 looked like with it at idle. My program ran very fast on it but not fast enough. https://i.servimg.com/u/f35/17/98/38/10/taskma10.png
#5721551
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254132.jpg
Gomez Addams:

The task manager won't show all of those because they aren't really "one machine." If it did you would have to scroll for days. Imagine saying, "I want to see what core 48382 is doing..." We had a machine here for a while with two chips, twenty cores each, and hyperthreading. That meant up to eighty threads. Here's what the task manager of W7 looked like with it at idle. My program ran very fast on it but not fast enough. https://i.servimg.com/u/f35/17/98/38/10/taskma10.png
Love it!
#5721599
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
"Can you hear me now?" Archer approved, well he would if he know what any of this was. to be the Monitor needed to see all the cores in task manager
#5721639
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/225/225084.jpg
Now imagine if every one of those cpus had a igpu and they could get that working too lol.
#5721796
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Reddoguk:

Now imagine if every one of those cpus had a igpu and they could get that working too lol.
It's 8+1 chiplet EPYCs... there's no space left at all on that substrate, and the I/O die is used in full. But with 128 PCI-e 4.0 lanes per CPU, why would you care about iGPU? The board can have 8 !!! full bandwidth high-performance GPUs, if needed.

Next Page