Which platforms is this gonna be on?

Looks good, and it will be available on PC and I can't wait till it comes out.

I will grab this in about a year at a discount to add to my CoD Collection. I only buy them for the Campaign anyway so I am never in a rush to get the latest one.

Seems like that soldies is moving with 24 fps

To be honest it looks the same as every other COD, graphics hardly any better than the previous releases... Nothing to see here...

I have never played a COD game in my life but I am definitely going to play this. This looks Amazing!

I might pick this one up spacy power

Call of Duty: Crysis 😀 SoloCreep - regarding graphics comments, the deal is that in 2007, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was released. It was running fine one first dual-core computers with GeForce 6600. Since then, the requirements were skyrocketing, while the graphics hasn't been improved that much to justify that. I don't want to say that new CoD will be bad or anything like that. Just get good old CoD4:MW and play it while waiting for Advanced Warfare.

Don't forget about Kevin Spacey. Surely he will make the game better?

look at how flat the textures are in that game....so 1980s. :P

Don't forget about Kevin Spacey. Surely he will make the game better?

Dont understimate his talent of developping and optimzing code for games engine. (:giggle2: )

Dont understimate his talent of developping and optimzing code for games engine.

Exactly my point!

That actually looked really good, visually anyway, definitely the best looking military shooter this year. Gameplay wise it looks a little different, but not much and I cant remember the last time I enjoyed a military shooter.

That actually looked really good, visually anyway, definitely the best looking military shooter this year. Gameplay wise it looks a little different, but not much and I cant remember the last time I enjoyed a military shooter.

You can enjoy a military shooter if you have a good team. It's not a requirement, but it helps a lot. I had so great time with Counter Strike, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Enemy Territory, BFBC2 and BF4, but mostly because of friends I was playing with, and as a result some great laughs. That makes Titanfall a very sad game in my position, as my friends don't play it and I consider it to be exceptionally good. Similar problem is with making a new game in a franchise every single year. Before you get used to a title, you have a bunch of DLCs, and not all of your friends buy them, then a new title is released, some buy it, some don't. People leave clans as they can't settle on which game to play, especially if the new title is buggy, and it sure will be buggy as hell... I think I might get Black Ops 2 and Advanced Warfare just for campaign. BO1 had a really nice campaign in my opinion so it may be the case here too. I wonder what would be needed to make such games last long and at the same time be profitable enough to be developed and avoid such break-down as I described earlier. One option for sure is milking the dedicated servers cash cow, as it was the case with Battlefield 2, but it tuned out to be not enough. Maybe this frequent release problem isn't so explicit among console gamers, but it really hurts the PC community, especially in poor countries where people have problems with spending $$$ on games and new computers to run them, and as said before, the new game doesn't have to be exactly better, at least before heavy patching.

I meant the campaign as not much of a MP gamer myself. I know what you mean about Titanfall as I tried it for a few hours on a friends X1 and it was a lot of fun, still o didn't want to risk buying the PC version as ive heard barely anyone is playing it anymore. I wonder if this will be a little more optimised, while BF Hardline looks a little underwhelming we all know Frostbite is usually well optimised.

COD 4- the best CODmw2- worse than MW COD Blops- good COd MW3-BAD COD BO2 Good COD Ghost- Bad COD Advanced warfare-good?

i like how you skipped a game to make that pattern work (world at war).