Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs

#5765879

cryohellinc

2020-03-04 08:52

Seems to be heavily biased towards NVIDIA.

#5765881

jbscotchman

2020-03-04 08:58

I find the lack of 1660 Ti disturbing.

#5765883

barbacot

2020-03-04 08:59

Great review - as always - I see one conclusion from it: AMD really needs an enthusiast card - let's hope that it will happen this year so that we will have competition at this level.

#5765885

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2020-03-04 09:02

jbscotchman:

I find the lack of 1660 Ti disturbing.

We've can't have you running around here at the forums all disturbed of course 🙂 ... so I'll add that card for you later today.

#5765887

Kaarme

2020-03-04 09:27

Looking at the chart, you'd think AMD's OpenGL compatibility was implemented through some emulation/conversion method.

#5765915

pharma

2020-03-04 12:04

Nice benchmark review from Guru3D. A possible addition to add to future GPU reviews since it targets normalized results across different API.

#5765919

Undying

2020-03-04 12:12

Nvidia basemark.

#5765921

Sempaii

2020-03-04 12:14

Thanks HH nice one as always 🙂 Happy to see my new Ryzen 3600 +2070 ( non super ) beats the I9 🙂

#5765926

The_Amazing_X

2020-03-04 12:24

Welcome to Nvidia testmark... We all know how AMD and vulkan and dx12 perform, if done right the performance will be really good. Not seen here not even anything close to that comon a R7 on the same performance as a 2060... Dosent make any sense, its like we are looking at unreal engine before dx12 was implemented. The review is good. Now the Benqmark performance needs to be put to the side until it makes any sense.

#5765935

Horus-Anhur

2020-03-04 12:37

Seems to be a bad way to benchmark graphics cards....

#5765938

geogan

2020-03-04 12:56

Nice, i was looking at first three graphs and trying to compare them and thinking "put them all on ONE graph 😡"... and then last graph appeared 😀

#5765939

Askmyteapot

2020-03-04 12:57

Just tested this on my 3900x and 5700XT system. Latest 2020.2.2 drivers installed. Windows 10 OpenGL ~4800 Windows 10 Vulkan ~8700 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) OpenGL ~7800 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) Vulkan ~ 8100 I think there is something very wrong with the windows version of the Radeon OpenGL Drivers.

#5765940

Askmyteapot

2020-03-04 13:01

Oh, and those Windows 10 scores... were with a +50% power target. The Linux ones were just stock.

#5765950

alanm

2020-03-04 13:32

Basemark looks like its going to be very controversial in the days, weeks ahead. I guess we have to wait for AMD to comment or offer an explanation of some sort.

#5765956

NiColaoS

2020-03-04 14:02

I'm seriously excited for my GPU. Best buy ever did. I got a 1660 Super with 2 Fans only 209 euros and the core clock without any OC stays steadily at 1935Mhz. But even more so because it's hand in hand with the 980Ti while extremely more efficient. Playing games at 1080p, 75Hz with VSync and FPS limited at 75, the card rarely works over 80% at full settings. Meanwhile since I plagued the card, it found normally my monitor's EDID settings with HMDI cable and locks at 75Hz PC Native. This was always a problem before ( HDMI cable was locking at limited colours, HDTV Native and 60Hz instead ).

#5765970

Truder

2020-03-04 14:38

Askmyteapot:

Just tested this on my 3900x and 5700XT system. Latest 2020.2.2 drivers installed. Windows 10 OpenGL ~4800 Windows 10 Vulkan ~8700 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) OpenGL ~7800 Linux Manjaro (5.6rc3 kernel) Vulkan ~ 8100 I think there is something very wrong with the windows version of the Radeon OpenGL Drivers.

The OpenGL drivers on Windows are just compatibility mode drivers, it's been that way for many years.

#5766009

jbscotchman

2020-03-04 16:35

Hilbert Hagedoorn:

We've can't have you running around here at the forums all disturbed of course 🙂 ... so I'll add that card for you later today.

lol 😀

#5766014