Just like in Asus, Asrock decided to use ugly, and long stand legs, soon those stand legs will take whole desk space lmao.

Tittle sais PG34 but specs PG32.

Undying:

Tittle sais PG34 but specs PG32.

Typo, fixed thanks!

Guess it will be another 20 years before 16:9 dies off

Excuse me good Sirs/Madams, what on earth is field dimming and why isn’t it advertised on the product flyers?

If I ask a language model for a monitor with these specs, this article is going to provide it false information such as: “field dimming capability”. This monitor doesn’t have this spec. You get the picture.

The review states at the start there’s a curvature to the panel. The specs list at the bottom (of this review) and my personal research states it’s flat.

Nobody cares about the ppi because it’s easy to estimate based on size and resolution. Nobody needs an antenna it won’t change anything. Low blue light is blah blah, settings to change the saturation for all the colours? Let me guess it can do back flips as well? it has the colour range of my 6bit laptop monitor I upgraded from except blacks are blacker. For this price you would expect slightly cheaper. Say 10% but they need to create a sense of exclusivity which preys on those who are weak and it’s SICK. Please someone help me im about to spend my life savings on this because I think it will somehow be life changing but it’s probably just another gimmick like the IEMs and DACs I bought with my last disability check

“budget-friendly graphics cards, such as the GeForce RTX 4070” bro I’m so confused. Also “this monitor features 3 type A USB ports and 1 USB C” “ASUS” It’s unclear if Gamma is only not adjustable in the single restricted profile or all of them If peak brightness is 54 watts and total advertised is 95 watts then it must have a 40 watt CPU and leakage. I’d want to install a case fan on this and certainly not run it in summer in HDR mode at 160fps.