If AMD can not compete with Nvidia, it should focus on taking one gpu for e-sports, another for 1080p, another for 4k and another for office and HTPC. With the lowest possible consumption and at a good price.

Moonbogg:

Stick to CPU's where you still have a chance.

Could you say that about AMD CPUs 2 years ago (Before ZEN release)? 😀

Moonbogg:

Almost as fast as a GTX 1080 huh AMD? Looking pretty good. Maybe you'll finally catch that oldass card in another 2 or 3 years. Looking real good. Fantastic. I just can't wait for AMD to release another way-behind-the-times slowass GPU that still can't compete with 3 year old hardware. Stick to CPU's where you still have a chance. I lost my patience with them. Their GPU division is dead. Completely hopeless, boring, and totally dead.

This goes without saying but: 1) These benchmarks most probably aren't real 2) If they are real, they were done with a pre-production development sample 3) If this is really Vega 20, it is not meant to be a gaming card 4) If this is some other gaming card, we have no idea where in the product stack it is supposed to be 5) No one benefits from a monopoly, so saying that AMD should get out of GPU business is like sawing off the branch you are sitting on

it can´t be VEGA20 even VEGA56, 14 to 7nm change, 2048 to 4096-bit HBM@Higher Clocks and Higher Core Clocks must increase performance a lot, no bottlenecks this time... greetings

Moonbogg:

Almost as fast as a GTX 1080 huh AMD? Looking pretty good. Maybe you'll finally catch that oldass card in another 2 or 3 years. Looking real good. Fantastic. I just can't wait for AMD to release another way-behind-the-times slowass GPU that still can't compete with 3 year old hardware. Stick to CPU's where you still have a chance. I lost my patience with them. Their GPU division is dead. Completely hopeless, boring, and totally dead.

Why don't you try working for AMD and make a GPU that stomps Nvidia? Seriously you need to chill out. This was expected since AMD almost went bankrupt and spent all of their peanuts on RYZEN architecture instead of their GPU's. The average user doesn't need an Nvidia 1080 gpu since it only makes a difference in benchmarks with a top of the line CPU............ even then you're bragging the extra 10-20fps. Mark my words with the money AMD makes on their cpu line they will drop a load of resources with their GPU team. I give it 1-2 years and AMD will be game with their high end GPU's.

Did anyone guess this might be the RX 580 refresh, the 590? As far as I know, Vega 64 isn't that far from the regular 1080.