AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 chips differ - physically and quite significantly (Updated)
Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 chips differ - physically and quite significantly (Updated) on our message forum
fantaskarsef
Still I can imagine it might make a marginal difference in physical resistance when mounting coolers, as well as a minor gain in thermal dissipation if that epoxy isn't present (epoxy doesn't transport heat well unless you put in the right fibres, or am I wrong?). With the final product it will probably make no difference though.
waltc3
NewTRUMP Order
__hollywood|meo
Amx85
Interesting...
Hilbert Please make other VEGA review with "Power Modes" comparision, VEGA 64 has Boost, Balanced and PwrSave on every BIOS (6 power modes in total) would be interesting see Gaming Performance per Watt with every mode to compare :infinity:
HeavyHemi
Evildead666
There is an update on this doing the rounds.
Its from Toms iirc.
There are 3 or 4 variants of the Vega chip apparently, with differing heights of HBM and GPU (depending on whether there is the epoxy filler or not).
I really hope this isn't going to be a b'stard for those of us who want to slap waterblocks on them...
edit : link : http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-vega-package-problem,35281.html
fantaskarsef
Evildead666
Well my EK Waterblock arrived this morning, so I might give it a shot this weekend.
I just hope I've got a chip with the epoxy filler included.
Agent-A01
Evildead666
Well, there WAS epoxy filler, so it was a walk in the park. 🙂