AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X - Official Benchmarks on our message forum
#5100689
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/263/263554.jpg
These cherry picked games are also running an a bizarre range of settings, I mean who would buy a high end GPU to run a 4k display with in game settings set to MEDIUM with no AF? Why not just simply put all games to maximum and set the 4k resolution with AFx16 and either AA on or off (throughout all tests) and see which is the better performer. Heck even the numbers from AC Unity are poor on both cards with those settings so why not just see what they can do flatout since we all now we can run 4k games if you adjust the settings.
True that, would love to see benches on max settings with maybe just AA on/off. But I guess we'll just have to wait a wee bit more.:eyes:
#5100690
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230258.jpg
Funny how Hilbert warns us all about the "reality distortion" of AMD's internal benchmark slides, while he was all over Nvidia's OC-driver slides: http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidias-tba-dx11-will-be-better-than-mantle.html In contrast with today: Hilbert, you have shown your color. *remove from bookmarks*
May be his words sometimes seem to be a little biased(may be I am biased to opposite?). But his charts are rock solid to me.
#5100691
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Funny how Hilbert warns us all about the "reality distortion" of AMD's internal benchmark slides, while he was all over Nvidia's OC-driver slides: http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/nvidias-tba-dx11-will-be-better-than-mantle.html In contrast with today: Hilbert, you have shown your color. *remove from bookmarks*
Read before writing. You are quoting re-posted text from the source, wccftech, not mine. You just cherry picked a result yourself.
#5100693
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/217/217375.jpg
All very curious, next week's Fury X review feels like Xmas coming early, kinda excited still 🙂
#5100706
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Looks like Fury will be faster than 980ti (which means it will be faster than TitanX too). Well done AMD, nVidia needs a price reductions, especially in Europe.
#5100713
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/116/116345.jpg
I hope the Fury X brings a price drop so I can splash my money on one of those 980 Ti's, if the custom Fury Xs don't come with a dvi port.. 🙂
#5100716
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/187/187161.jpg
our wallets... ha-ha ...ha 🙁
http://i.imgur.com/bAI0Pt5.jpg
If the Fury X trades blows with the 980Ti then AMD have done themselves proud as far as I'm concerned, anything more is really bonus. Looking forward to the G3D review.
Agreed 100%
You are mixing Titan and Ti. Ti costs only $50-100 more than Fury X, and it doesnt have to. Nvidia is quite much free to do what ever they want with the price now that Fury is out. Cant wait to see what happens.
I'm not mixing anything. Veteran commented that the Titan will destroy the Fury X regardless, and my comment was that I hope so considering the Titan is $400 more than the Fury X.
nVidia needs a price reductions, especially in Europe.
I agree. I'm hoping that this causes prices to drop $50-100 for the Ti. Probably a pipe dream, but it'd be nice for it to happen right before I pick a couple up.
#5100721
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Fury X will be faster compared to 980ti in majority (if not all) of cases, combined with raw performance that are always on AMD side, I don't see how 980ti would be competition to it (except at lower price, or for lower power consumption - small margin). Also, after future update of the products, raw performance of Fury will be even more visible (same thing that happened with HD 7000, 200 series etc., compared to nvidia cards at the time, they did trade blows, from perspective of just year latter, nvidia products was far inferior, and still are, as they was). Just something to keep on mind.
I would not be surprised. When Pascal comes they will just drop support for Maxwell just like they did with Kepler. Also, prices in Europe are just insane. nVidia needs to something or they wont stay competitive. 550€ for 980? No thanks.
#5100722
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90667.jpg
Fury X will be faster compared to 980ti in majority (if not all) of cases, combined with raw performance that are always on AMD side, I don't see how 980ti would be competition to it (except at lower price, or for lower power consumption - small margin). Also, after future update of the products, raw performance of Fury will be even more visible (same thing that happened with HD 7000, 200 series etc., compared to nvidia cards at the time, they did trade blows, from perspective of just year latter, nvidia products was far inferior, and still are, as they was). Just something to keep on mind.
Not really current, although 290x superior to all kepler cards, which wasn't suppose to be, but nvidia playing dirty tricks with the Kepler downgrade issue. I do hope amd scores wins with fury, cause those 300 series are just a fail, better buy 200 series with lower price.
#5100729
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/217/217375.jpg
Not really current, although 290x superior to all kepler cards, which wasn't suppose to be, but nvidia playing dirty tricks with the Kepler downgrade issue. I do hope amd scores wins with fury, cause those 300 series are just a fail, better buy 200 series with lower price.
I'm starting to notice that trend from NVidia, if they do that again a second generation running they are going to start losing a Lot of loyal customers who don't like such lag/drop in performance compared to AMDs old cards & getting their resale prices trashed.
#5100730
data/avatar/default/avatar40.webp
8GB and 16GB HBM2 will be standard for 2016(/2017). 32GB on Tesla/Quadro. Those are the facts! 4GB card no matter how fast, is direct opposite of forward looking card. It just is. And this is un-spinable Then again everything in sight will be demolished once 16nm, HBM2 and Pascal land, so perhaps 4GB is not such a big deal after all.
#5100731
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Wait, what? **** NVIDIA MAN... WTF, not for europe? What ****ing discrimation is this, **** them man, WTF!!!!!.... I'm ****ing pissed about this,... ****ing idiots....
I dont know why are you so surprised. nVidia always doing this. In Europe you could probably get Fury for the price of 980, not 980ti. I know what i'm goona choose. 😉
#5100732
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/116/116345.jpg
I wanna get a fury x dude but no dvi-d port lol.. 😀
#5100734
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/217/217375.jpg
Wait, what? **** NVIDIA MAN... WTF, not for europe? What ****ing discrimation is this, **** them man, WTF!!!!!.... I'm ****ing pissed about this,... ****ing idiots....
haha oh **** that's just not funny -.-" Win for AMD ^_^
#5100741
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/217/217299.jpg
If its equal or faster than 980ti but it is cheaper, i think its not a brainer. I dont know why im so excited to see those benchmarks, im not even planing to upgrade 😀
#5100748
data/avatar/default/avatar06.webp
Wait, what? **** NVIDIA MAN... WTF, not for europe? What ****ing discrimation is this, **** them man, WTF!!!!!.... I'm ****ing pissed about this,... ****ing idiots....
Just browsed one of the online shops here: Cheapest 980(ZOTAC GTX 980 AMP Omega) - 550€ Reference 980Ti(made from Palit) - 700€ Ouch 🙁
#5100751
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/211/211619.jpg
The price of tech over here is generally more expensive anyway, but not doing a global price drop is pretty shady. So much politics in GPU's now a days!

Previous Page

Next Page