AMD Fiji XT and Bermuda XT make Mystery Appearance

Published by

Click here to post a comment for AMD Fiji XT and Bermuda XT make Mystery Appearance on our message forum
#4978058
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
lol COD AW, like that's some next-gen game.. 😀 other stuff is still too low to be playable @ 4k..
#4978063
data/avatar/default/avatar21.webp
incoming nvidia but hurt fan boys over a rumor leak slide in 3..2..1
#4978072
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/124/124168.jpg
^^ like I care if it beats a gm200.
#4978079
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
If Im gonna get GM200 I won't be playing @4K.. Im fine with 24" 1080p & downsampling. GK110 is ok @ 1080p, GM200 or 390X will tear through it & downsampling e.g. 2560x1440 or 2880 x1620 😀
#4978101
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
I just want to see real tests 😯 not these weird ones that tell us nothing but rumors 😀 If true bermuda is a good card for sure and something like 50% faster then 290x. and Fiji would be pretty good card too. Hmmh. Oh well we will see.
#4978105
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/206/206905.jpg
Interesting, I will still be buying titan 2 and that chart means nothing. Once dx12 appears and new drivers things will change. Not to mention running on water and volt mods.
#4978111
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
incoming nvidia but hurt fan boys over a rumor leak slide in 3..2..1
A non existent card beats a non existent card. People aren't supposed to get butt-hurt over that? It's like the dumbest thing I've ever seen, even if the roles were reversed I'd be mad. So mad. Next-Gen mad.
#4978114
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90667.jpg
Too many rumors, you know u can say and try point out fingers at random made up slideshows, GM200 is gonna be impressive idk about 390X, but whatever card is better there still time for it.
#4978115
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/142/142454.jpg
This thread needs to be moved from the Front Page News section to the Speculative/ Utter BS section.
#4978124
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229509.jpg
What is it with NF Fanboys and all these negative waves...
#4978128
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
What is it with NF Fanboys and all these negative waves...
It isn't about Nvidia or AMD, it's about retarded rumors. Like even when all the sites leaked the part numbers & shipping information about the 980 and detailed specs and marquee features and whatnot, they still got performance rumors wrong. Even with all that the rumors were still inaccurate, all the way up to like 2 weeks before it launched. Now here you have 2 unreleased graphics cards being compared. There is no part numbers, no specifics, nothing. It's two lines on a picture. I can do that in photoshop in like three seconds and I'm pretty confident that if I did it would be posted on Guru3D front page within like a day. It doesn't matter if its Nvidia or AMD, it's just bogus nonsense. Even if this turns out to be accurate, it's irrelevant to me as news now.
#4978129
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/69/69564.jpg
It's almost like someone is posting fake "news" to create these wars.. wink wink
#4978132
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
It's almost like someone is posting fake "news" to create these wars.. wink wink
Yeah, Chiphell. Driving thousands of people to their site the owner can get some Christmas shopping in.
#4978137
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238795.jpg
I'll wait for the cards to be in someone's hand and a real benchmark site, such as guru3d does performance analysis before I make a decision of what I buy next. Right now it's all an illusion.
#4978147
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164785.jpg
It isn't about Nvidia or AMD, it's about retarded rumors. Like even when all the sites leaked the part numbers & shipping information about the 980 and detailed specs and marquee features and whatnot, they still got performance rumors wrong. Even with all that the rumors were still inaccurate, all the way up to like 2 weeks before it launched. Now here you have 2 unreleased graphics cards being compared. There is no part numbers, no specifics, nothing. It's two lines on a picture. I can do that in photoshop in like three seconds and I'm pretty confident that if I did it would be posted on Guru3D front page within like a day. It doesn't matter if its Nvidia or AMD, it's just bogus nonsense. Even if this turns out to be accurate, it's irrelevant to me as news now.
This^^ It's the same f*cking bullsh!t cavalcade of garbage every single time from the same utterly unreliable sources. Wait until release, base your purchasing decisions on the facts, not 'fly by night' websites that are only interested in generating click revenue.
#4978153
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/55/55855.jpg
Nvidia GM200 / Titan 2 , AMD Fiji / R9 380X and Bermuda / R9 390X Benchmarked Without any further delay let’s get into the contents of this new leak. 1- The author on Chiphell claims that both Fiji and Bermuda i.e R9 380X and R9 390X are manufactured on a 20nm process node by Globalfoundries. The author did not specify which process GM200 is built on however. 2- There are two versions of GM200, a cut down version with 21 SMM units amounting to 2688 CUDA cores and a fully unlocked “full fat” version with an unknown number of SMMs / CUDA cores. 3- Fiji XT will not be the flagship GPU from AMD, the flagship will be Bermuda XT. 4- The fully unlocked “full fat” GM200 is 34% faster than the GTX 980 according to the leaker. This puts it at roughly 2816-3072 CUDA cores assuming it’s slightly underclocked compared to the GTX 980. 5- Bermuda XT / R9 390X is 65% faster than the R9 290X / Hawaii XT and will feature a hybrid “Hydra” liquid cooling unit similar to the R9 295X2. This matches the previous leak by a Chinese source that we saw a few months back, which indicated that AMD will be using liquid cooling on a future single-GPU graphics card.
From Wccf.
#4978160
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196284.jpg
These "benchmarks" (click-bait rumors) are a joke anyway. What's the point of AMD having such performance at 4K, if the cards are outperformed at 1080? Most users are running 1080 or lower still. I couldn't possibly care less which card has the best performance at 4K. If I'm buying the best performing card within a given price range, does it really matter that it loses it's ass at 4K, if it completely obliterates it's competition at 1080? Not in the least.
^^ like I care if it beats a gm200.
You're also not among those he's referring to.
#4978161
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242471.jpg
What is it with NF Fanboys and all these negative waves...
lol that's why those really butt hurt are giving it low ratings. I voted 5 just to see how low it will go, someone already beat me to it and gave 1 at first, it was 3 now its back to 2 😀
#4978179
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/163/163560.jpg
It's clearly click bait as mentioned many times before, but taking it on a just as speculative view that if these were factual figures it's nice to see ATI come back eventually from the AMD buyout years ago. Before then ATI were constantly trading blows with Nvidia for top spot cards and soon after dropped the ball with some power hungry, noisy and hot running cards. Who remembers the 9800 from ATI which decimated everything for ages, or the x1950XTX. Once again I call bull**** on this but a little bit of me still hopes it's true and we can see the return of the real ATI/AMD.
#4978205
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/54/54823.jpg
I actually believe the chart. It's about what I'd expect with a AIO loaded 390X. I'll be ditching these 980s.

Next Page