Activision releases System Requirements Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Activision releases System Requirements Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare on our message forum
#4941580
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/90/90726.jpg
+1 In another year we'll get Cowadooty; flashy mlg sniper warfare with dubstep.
Ugh! Blah! Dubstep as a genre deserves better than being added to yet another bland COD game.
#4941600
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/255/255340.jpg
BF4 - 47gb on my drive, including DLC's. 55GB is a lot. No wonder such gamers take much time to load. The graphics requirements look weird. 5870 seems to be significantly faster than 450. Also, 6GB of RAM? Really? Perhaps it'll be used for some texture/geometry/sound streaming or something like that, but it's a lot. There are still quite a few people with 4GB only - according to Steam survey, less than 50% of players have 6GB+
Why wound sound streaming even take 100mb?
#4941612
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/114/114613.jpg
I have never played a COD game because none of them interested me "not because its cool to hate on".. This one though I think I will give a go. I like the jet packs and I love futuristic games. The graphics aren't too shabby either. Also Kevin Spacey is badass!
#4941618
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/186/186805.jpg
As much as I agree COD has been milked to death. My last proper COD game I played to death was Black Ops 1. Which is still a good game. MW3 was shockingly bad but ran VERY well on literally any machine BO2 was pretty bad but still decent game VERY well optimized GHOSTS on the other hand is a different story, worst COD game ever. Totally unoptimized piece of crap runs like a dog even today it has been patched and is better but still frame rates don't meet up with the bad graphics. HOPEFULLY! This one will be better and hopefully it will perform more like BO2 and MW3 as they were very well optimized on PC. Also this game actually looks pretty good, from the trailers you have to admit that the game looks visually pretty stunning in parts.
#4941629
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
Maybe they will code COD so it wont try and use 6GB of Vram instead of the system ram. Most games I play i tend to be in the 5-6GB of system ram usage so that is not a big deal, typical gaming rigs should have 8GB now days.
#4941722
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246442.jpg
Killing? FPS has been dead for a while now. One crappy online multi game after another, no tx.
What an absolutely stupid thing to say, have you played crysis 3, shadow warrior or wolfenstein the new order?
#4941735
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115616.jpg
Why wound sound streaming even take 100mb?
Titanfall for example used uncompressed sounds. Also, I mentioned total streaming requirements - if the gamer takes 55gb, it's either a super-lengthy high-res campaign or a lot of various big assets will be used at once/almost at once.
I don't see a problem with the game requiring a system with 6 GB of RAM, nor do I see a problem with it being 64-bit only (which is a requirement with 6 GB of RAM). I'm surprised nobody has complained that it required a DirectX 11 card to run 😉. (...)
It's not that easy. There are quite a few people on DDR2, and these are difficult to upgrade. For example my brother's gaming rig is C2Q @ 3.6 GHz, 4GB RAM, Radeon 280x. It can handle pretty much every game I throw at it. I suspect that at low details, the new CoD may not require that much RAM for itself, but they added some extra as a buffer for the operating system and other background apps, similar to PSU requirements stated by GPU manufacturers.
#4941856
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/69/69564.jpg
What an absolutely stupid thing to say, have you played crysis 3, shadow warrior or wolfenstein the new order?
dead gabben
#4942030
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246442.jpg
dead gabben
What?
#4942035
data/avatar/default/avatar17.webp
Yeah. Not sure id call it an id engine still tho. Even source was based on that same engine.
No.. source was based on the Quake engine not Quake 3 engine.
#4942036
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/113/113386.jpg
I wonder why they stopped making it support dx10, while their games are very well optimized. Yes except for Ghosts ofc.
#4942040
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
I wonder why they stopped making it support dx10, while their games are very well optimized. Yes except for Ghosts ofc.
Better looking flashlight with DX11 😉 .
#4942048
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/69/69564.jpg
What?
You don't keep up with the news much, can't help you with that so you can get the comment gabe pic person
#4942309
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56004.jpg
Since I've bought just about every COD game (including the original COD and United Offensive), it's a given I'm gonna grab this one as well. Even if it has sucktastic gameplay, I don't care because Kevin Spacey's in in.;)
#4942468
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/113/113386.jpg
That's not what i meant mate, DX11 used to be compatible with DX10. Would it be that much of an effort, if they just let the game disable dx11 features when it detects a dx10 card. Even BF4 runs on DX10 cards, yeah dx10 is old now i understand, but them high-end cards can run pretty much any modern game still on decent settings. But oh well, whats done is done right?

Previous Page