27" 5K Dell UP2715K in December at less than $2000 USD

Published by

Click here to post a comment for 27" 5K Dell UP2715K in December at less than $2000 USD on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/253/253059.jpg
Pointless. Ive been using a 30" dell for 8 years and the size of the dot pitch has been fine. I see zero reason to increase it yet we see 24" screens with Pixel Pitch of 0.137 mm That's just stupid and completely unnecessary. Here is a screen shot of a game with 2560x1600 screen res and I would like to know why anyone feels the need to increase it. http://www.freeleacher.webspace.virginmedia.com/9.jpg Pls tell me what`s wrong with the detail of this image im interested to here what you have to say
I think you're missing the point. It isn't about cramming more detail into the same desktop. It is about being able to edit UHD video without having to scale it down to fit on the screen. Editing at 2560x1600 would cause UHD video to be displayed at only ~1080p if you want to have toolbars and stuff open while editing. I'm sure you thought 640x480 was more than enough back in the 80s, until you found something that needed more pixels. That is, if you were even alive in the 80s.
data/avatar/default/avatar25.webp
Im running 4k on Asus LCD at 60hz and games look much better. I had a120hz before but I couldn't notice difference with the speed. 60hz is fast enough even playing COD AW. Thing is Dell screwed up with last 4k with only 30hz.
data/avatar/default/avatar29.webp
Finally Tri SLI would make sense. Yup. I really don't get the point of such high resolutions on small sized screens. Maybe photographers use it .. dunno. Windows 10 scales well on Hi DPI screens however.
IMO you do notice a difference I have a 28" 4k Asus and there is a visible difference. Just gotta have larger icons/text.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220214.jpg
I think you're missing the point. It isn't about cramming more detail into the same desktop. It is about being able to edit UHD video without having to scale it down to fit on the screen. Editing at 2560x1600 would cause UHD video to be displayed at only ~1080p if you want to have toolbars and stuff open while editing.
No, most pro video editors find editing in native 4k too slow so they actually use lower resolution HD proxies to edit and not the original 4K files. The editor then replaces with original at render time. All the pro software has this built in. No actual need for 4K monitor. But I do agree these are for professional graphics and design work not for these childish monkeys here just to play games at higher resolution with...