ATI Radeon 9800 Pro - Reference

Graphics cards 1049 Page 9 of 17 Published by

teaser

Performance - AquaMark 2.3

Aquamark 2.3imageview.php?image=110One of my favorite benchmarks is AquaMark based upon the Krass engine that the upcoming title Aquanox serves. 

2666 Five years after the gigantic battle of mankind against a mysterious bio-robotic species called " the Bionts" the world of Aqua is put to its hardest test.

Very strange things happen while Emerald Flint, a mercenary coming from the anarchistic "Tornado Zone", is trying to find out about the secrets of an extremely dangerous gang of pirates, the "Crawlers". And Flint never works without his four wingpilots!  A latent civil war reigns in Neopolis, the capital of the Atlantic Federation. The armed forces, which are supporting certain putschists, have built a scientific station off Atacama City, that they call "Brainfire".

The military experiment goes wrong and triggers off a cascade of serious incidents. Seaquakes shake the whole globe. Huge godlike monsters are creeping from out of their prison where they have been captured for thousands of years. They want to take revenge on mankind. The Crawlers are in league with the rebelling armed forces and Flint loses his best friend through his own fault. A whirl of fear, violence and chaos slowly pulls the heroes into the middle of the pulsating heart of evil.

Before we start benchmarking let's take a look at this nifty piece of software that we will use for DirectX8 and higher compatible videocard product-reviews.

With the benchmark program AquaMark you are able to test the effectivity of the video card of the user's computer under real world conditions. This means, that AquaMark is not a common demo-benchmark. It contains a fully working game engine. The first published version of AquaMark (2.1) is based on krass engine, that serves also for 3D-realtime-rendering. AquaMark 1.0 and 2.0 were non-public versions. AquaMark has been optimized to compare DX8 on different video cards and supports all necessary features such as f.e. vertexshader or pixelshader etc.

AquaMark 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE   76 52 38
Radeon 9700 Pro 88 82 68 50
Radeon 9800 Pro 89 85 73 56
GF FX 5800 Ultra 81 78 72 61

We notice again that in the lower resolutions the Radeon 9800 Pro is on top while in 1600x1200 the GeForce FX clearly wins. Let's look at AA and AF:

AquaMark 800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200
Radeon 9800 Pro 89 85 73 56
2x AA 88 81 63 45
4x AA 86 75 52 38
6x AA 81 60 41 30
8x AF 81 70 50 35
16x AF 80 69 49 35
4x AA & 8x AF 73 53 36 26

One thing is a sure fact, the Radeon 9800 Pro is darn efficient when it comes to quality optimized features. The results you see here are extremely good.

imageview.php?image=111

Share this content
Twitter Facebook Reddit WhatsApp Email Print