Titanfall: Xbox One vs PC Graphics Comparison
Click here to post a comment for Titanfall: Xbox One vs PC Graphics Comparison on our message forum
Prince Valiant
I really don't understand the video comparisons, lossless screenshots provide a real comparison that isn't being dumped on by compression artifacts and they eat less bandwidth.
At RedDawn: Even with all other things equal, X resolution and AA is a huge advantage.
SoloCreep
1. We will not see a big difference with these videos from YouTube.
2. The visual gap should be smaller now since we are dealing with newer consoles. I expect a Xbox One or a PS4 to look similar to a PC now. Its not going to be like it was with the old Xbox 360.
Trolle
Dragondale13
PC version looks much clearer from the start.Xbox1 version looks good also for what it is.Don't see what the fuss is about honestly.
gapson
You need to have an "apple to apple" comparison to be honest when you comparing a console vs PC. Of coz we all know that PC will do the best out when you have an ultimate machine...
I have been playing FPS and various games on PC for almost 15 years and the investment I have made were enormous!
Putting value for money to your front side, a console could have longer life span than PC as the game developers would adjust (downgrade) the graphics quality to suit. But game developers tend to set higher hardware and software requirements in pc in order to draw the interest of gamers. So the main point is where you place your value on: value or graphics?***65279;
nicugoalkeper
Mojojoe
Not as huge a difference as I was expecting, more because the PC version didn't look like it was using particularly high resolution textures than anything else. Although the scene with the rocky peaks in the mid-ground did a pretty good job of highlighting some of the more noticeable differences like the AA, LOD and the more pronounced colour correction of the XBOX.
I'm a little disappointed really, during their history consoles have introduced innovative new forms of gameplay and then a period of introducing ground breaking technology that was ahead of anything else available. Now they seem to be doing neither, which doesn't really sound like a good plan for survival.
scoter man1
I can't see much of a difference. It looks like they use really poor textures on both, the pc has slightly better lighting, that's it.
ManofGod
Eh, they both look good to me. I have personally just gotten to the point that for myself, I have grown tired of being a graphics whore.
xIcarus
xodius80
television gama from a pc gama are very different in my opinion, reason why the xbone looks darker, and since the devs made this game with pc in mind first, i think they forgot to put a proper gamma profile in the xbone version.
MonstroMart
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2000/10/23/it-is-also-called-moolah
EA as the publisher. Money paid by MS for the exclusivity. It's no surprise the the game looks average on PC (average at best).
Even worst this is an EA published game sponsored by Microsoft. Don't ever think that a company like EA decided to make a game exclusive without receiving an hat made of cash.
kill007
tbh..the textures on the PC is pretty dam low res, lots of blurry textures, so i dunno if its really a fair comparison.
sure it looks a bit nicer on the pc, gameplay should also be a lot smoother, but textures....its just looks nice due to high resolution. there is tons of blurry textures in titanfall.
AbjectBlitz
Xbox version has slightly lower rez textures and some awfull blur filter on, fxaa or some such. Other than that looks the same.
xIcarus