#4648215

jack_rudolph

2013-09-02 09:19

Way to Chunky for me ....... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1Exv8_tbTY

#4648220

kosh_neranek

2013-09-02 09:38

hope this isn't the final design.very poor, very chunky. no woman or a slender man would ever put that on a wrist. and that's most of the population out..let's wait and see

#4648231

kanej2007

2013-09-02 10:07

Agreed with the above. The watch is way too chunky due to it's poor design. I highly doubt Samsung will sell many of them.

#4648236

dcx_badass

2013-09-02 10:31

Massive, and a 10 hour battery, do Samsung even understand what a watch is?

#4648262

Undying

2013-09-02 11:54

Lol, a brick on my hand...no thanks.

#4648271

scatman839

2013-09-02 12:13

Make a similar thing with an eink screen and maybe

#4648272

H83

2013-09-02 12:17

What´s the point of this garbage anyway?...

#4648278

fellix

2013-09-02 12:35

I lost my habit wearing watches long time ago. Peeking at the phone is the new norm anyway, why reverting back?

#4648282

John

2013-09-02 12:49

Top lel. Design wise it looks like one of those calculator watches from the 80's. And who wants to charge their watch every single day? Yeah no.

#4648283

Koniakki

2013-09-02 12:54

I agree with everyone. Way too much volume. But guys remember this is the 1st gen of it. I believe it will take another 2(GSW3? if all goes well) for it to shed all that volume. :P Also Michael J. Fox was wearing one of those watches mentioned above. So it must atleast be somewhat cool right? 😀 http://itonlinenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/5839590_f520.jpg Bonus Photos: [spoiler]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3651/3501255346_3c873da97e.jpghttp://www.geekalerts.com/u/cal-watch2.jpg[/spoiler]

#4648286

John

2013-09-02 12:59

I agree with everyone. Way too much volume. But guys remember this is the 1st gen of it. I believe it will take another 2(GSW3? if all goes well) for it to shed all that volume. :P

If knowing the smartphone market right, they're only gonna get bigger. Soon we'll be walking with 7" screens on our wrists...

#4648288

k1net1cs

2013-09-02 13:08

Peeking at the phone is the new norm anyway, why reverting back?

Because not all people are tech-conscious introverts with phones always on their hands. It's easier to just raise one hand to look at the wristwatch compared to ruffling a pocket, fishing for the phone, and pressing a button to make the screen lit up. Anyway, agree with what's been said in previous posts: too bulky. But then again, I still reserve my judgment until its launch.

#4648362

Labyrinth

2013-09-02 16:25

Now try getting a shirt cuff around that

#4648367

lucidus

2013-09-02 16:38

They should've waited for Apple to release one first.

#4648457

CronoGraal

2013-09-02 20:25

silly samsung, you can only piggy-back once apple actually breaks the market!

#4648481

airbud7

2013-09-02 20:56

http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/961/u3qg.jpg I like this one

#4648542

Mojojoe

2013-09-02 22:51

Peeking at the phone is the new norm anyway, why reverting back?

Before looking at your wristwatch it was a case of pulling your pocket watch out to see the time. So pulling something out of your pocket is actually 'reverting back' further.

#4648556

airbud7

2013-09-02 23:05

Before looking at your wristwatch it was a case of pulling your pocket watch out to see the time. So pulling something out of your pocket is actually 'reverting back' further.

Somehow?, that^ comment made me feel younger....

#4648624

sykozis

2013-09-03 01:50

silly samsung, you can only piggy-back once apple actually breaks the market!

Samsung is following Sony and a bunch of other companies this time....same as Apple.

#4648627

Loophole35

2013-09-03 01:57

Yeah.............no this is a pointless idea. I am a bit bias though as I have a severe distaste towards digital watches I love anolog watches.