THine's V-by-One HS Brings NVIDIA G-SYNC Technology to 4K Displays

Published by

Click here to post a comment for THine's V-by-One HS Brings NVIDIA G-SYNC Technology to 4K Displays on our message forum
#4854355
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/228/228458.jpg
OMG! This is what I want.
#4854359
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/235/235224.jpg
OMG! This is what I want.
Me tooooo! :banana:
#4854362
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/178/178868.jpg
Finally... We're getting somewhere! Hopefully, reasonable pricing is the last thing we need.
#4854380
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/228/228458.jpg
Finally... We're getting somewhere! Hopefully, reasonable pricing is the last thing we need.
Hopefully sub $1000. I'm not holding my breath though 🤓
#4854390
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230424.jpg
What amazes me is that hardware manufactures are prepared to put the work in, but their mates in the gaming industry are not. This great news though.
#4854404
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254719.jpg
You'll need 2 TitanZ to get perfectly sync
#4854419
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230424.jpg
'You'll need 2 TitanZ to get perfectly sync
...to run a Ubisoft game.' - PC Community
#4854525
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Im not sure to understand, their technology of cables replace the HDMI, DP etc ? ... so they will sell you the cable for rely your 4K monitors for get the same results with or without it but you can use it with G-sync ? Nice marketing tricks .
#4854528
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/66/66219.jpg
Great! Now its time to work on that 120hz 4k... Should be just in time for video cards that can run 4k @ 60fps max (ish) video settings!?:thumbup:
#4854590
data/avatar/default/avatar24.webp
I was not really sure where this company is trying to go with this annonces. . ( or Nvidia, but i think they have take some money in the deal anyway for a complete useless thing for monitor 4K using G-sync ) ..
#4854591
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
"The enhanced performance and lower costs of V-by-One HS has made it the internal interconnect choice of major 4Kx2K televisions and PC monitors" Nothing shows cutting costs like adding a $200 component. Because simply adopting DP 1.2a is way more expensive. DP 1.3 (expected in Q2) is going to support 8K and dual 4K over a single cable.
It's a $200 component because nvidia chose to implement it via FPGA. If they use an ASIC scalar it would be no more expensive then the average scalar chip in any other monitor. And you need VBLANK support in the scalar anyway for freesync. It's not as simple as just adding DP 1.2a.
I was not really sure where this company is trying to go with this annonces. .
Sell their technology to OEMs?
#4854594
data/avatar/default/avatar30.webp
Denial.. the 200$ is not for G-sync in this case, this company just try to bring their connection as a DP or HDMI .. The FPGA of G-sync replace the scaler ( for do the exact same thing of the adaptative V-sync VESa standard ( without need to offer it as a standard on monitor side ( + store the last frames in the DDR3 memory in the case the frame need be resend to the monitor ), so its not the scaler... so this company sell what.. better cable and connection of DP ? Allow some monitor 4K to be used with G-sync before the DP standard is up and running ? Pure marketing ?
#4854606
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Denial.. the 200$ is not for G-sync in this case, this company just try to bring their connection as a DP or HDMI .. G-sync replace the scaler, so its not the scaler... so this company sell what.. better cable and connection of DP or HDMI ? I can see the case for special ultra high end projection on TV, not really on a PC monitor . ( outside the add of G-sync ).. Pure marketing Bull**** ?
I assume they provide the interconnect before and after the scalar. I mean internally they don't use displayport to move the signal around, displayport ends at the connector. So after the signal hits the displayport on the monitor it's routed via their chip to the scalar, then routed from there to the actual panel. I'm assuming they are the only does that can do that on 4K with G-Sync? I don't know -- it is probably marketing but I really want to see 4K G-Sync/Freesync monitors.
#4854614
data/avatar/default/avatar31.webp
I assume they provide the interconnect before and after the scalar. I mean internally they don't use displayport to move the signal around, displayport ends at the connector. So after the signal hits the displayport on the monitor it's routed via their chip to the scalar, then routed from there to the actual panel. I'm assuming they are the only does that can do that on 4K? I don't know.
I dont think ... this is just a marketing from them ( from the scaler perspective, dont forget, G-sync FPGA; replace the scaler for allow the monitor to do the same thing of the DP1.2a ( let the gpu control the v-sync ) ... the memory on the FPGA is only used for store the last frame, in case it is needed to be resended ( if it take more of 33.3ms of the gpu for render the frame ( udner 30fps ).. Their connection system was made for an alternative of HDMI or DP ... So they have ask a licence to Nvidia, thinking they will benefit them, outside this, i dont think Nvidia have only this solution.. Anyway for the FPGA; i ask me If Nvidia can use the dynamic v-blank state / refresh state ( dont misundrestand with the dynamic v-sync used in Kepler driver ) because it is licenced by ATI, since many years and now is part of AMD licence... so outside, the gpu, do they need the FPGA for reproduct it and beeing outside the appliccation of the AMD /ATI licence . ? without need to ask a licence to AMD for include it directly in their gpu ?
#4855295
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
great now where are the moniters with gsync that dont cost as much as at 780gtx
#4855513
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
Great! Now its time to work on that 120hz 4k... Should be just in time for video cards that can run 4k @ 60fps max (ish) video settings!?:thumbup:
My understanding is that with the proper implementation of freesync/gsync 120hz becomes completely unnecessary.