#6056619

Venix

2022-10-02 10:32

Wait is it just me .... Or the naming now is crystal clear ??? I was not expecting that kudos !

#6056629

Neo Cyrus

2022-10-02 10:40

Venix:

Wait is it just me .... Or the naming now is crystal clear ??? I was not expecting that kudos !

I give it a week before they rename everything for the 52nd time and use vegetable symbols and colours for USB ratings this time. You can't cure stupid.

#6056631

Venix

2022-10-02 10:50

Neo Cyrus:

I give it a week before they rename everything for the 52nd time and use vegetable symbols and colours for USB ratings this time. You can't cure stupid.

ahahaha I was thinking to ask if that's an early April's fools joke and they will return to some other less clear naming right away , but I thought to keep a positive outlook ! :P

#6056647

Loobyluggs

2022-10-02 12:30

About god damn time.

#6056721

turbare

2022-10-02 15:58

So USB 2.0 is the High Speed one referenced in there?

#6056726

Crazy Serb

2022-10-02 16:12

Did someone at USB-IF got hit in the head?! This is definitively not normal for IT standards... I hope others like VESA, nvidia and AMD to follow. Not sure about intel naming shenanigans.

#6056755

Alessio1989

2022-10-02 18:56

I don't see USB 10Gbps cable :V

#6056761

Mda400

2022-10-02 19:23

To the point and no 3.1 /3.2, 2x1/2x2 fluff. If I want a 20 gbps cable that can charge my laptop, all I have to look for is that 20gbps logo with 60w.

#6056824

mackintosh

2022-10-02 22:31

A bit late, but better late than never. Any change that will make this clusterturd clearer is welcome.

#6056828

schmidtbag

2022-10-02 22:54

Or y'know... they could've just stuck with a more sensible number for power delivery and bandwidth that all host devices and cables could be expected to provide, thereby making it actually universal. It's such a shame because there is so much potential to make it a great interface.

#6056874

rl66

2022-10-03 08:33

And when they will do a revision, like in the past, will it be "USB 40 Gbps 2" or will it "USB 45 (as an exemple) Gbps" ... lol More on topic, it should have been like than since the 1st USB as all type A and B look the same from 1 to 4.

#6056976

tsunami231

2022-10-03 16:30

less confusing now i guess the wattage packaging and cable look confusing which is 240w and 60w? according to this all cables cappable of 240w and 60w? or is there 240w and 60w verisons of these cables atlest lest there is not more 3.2 superspeed 10gbps and 3.2 superspeed 20gbps. Naming it USB1/2/3/4 etc would been fine if every time there was new verison and the speed increase they just upped the number by one

#6057272

geogan

2022-10-04 17:09

Yeah... the Gbps is clearer, but I never heard of the wattage rating... didn't know there was a 60W and 240W version of cables with same speed??

#6057314

mackintosh

2022-10-04 19:19

There are, it's a complete mess. Previous iterations also had these issues.