Its ubisoft. I'm skeptical.

The random fake shooting noises in the DZ got old quick and the guns sound really hollow and high pitched to me. The voice acting was kind of weak too, the initial Asian woman you meet sounded incredibly uninspiring and the dialog was really cheesy.

Those were fake?! Ah damn, they scared me so many times so i would just run away from the area 😀 Agree with you, that woman at the start really annoyed me, but the rest seem to be okay

Of what? The open beta was just out a week ago, it looked the same as it does here, only I couldn't pull 60fps maxed out on my 980. It's a good looking game, with an absolute metric ton of environmental detail. Like the team that worked on that portion of the game definitely aced it. I didn't care for the sound though. The random fake shooting noises in the DZ got old quick and the guns sound really hollow and high pitched to me. The voice acting was kind of weak too, the initial Asian woman you meet sounded incredibly uninspiring and the dialog was really cheesy. I also thought the beta was repetitive and boring gameplay wise. Not only the missions, which there was only two (can't really fault them for that), but the combat was kinda boring for me as well, even in the Dark Zone -- I entertained myself by purposely standing in front of people shooting AI so they'd flag rogue and I could kill them lol.. It kind of reminded me of like a third person shooter Diablo. I think it's a good game, it's just not for me.

this is interesting view about ubisoft if u think there 100% honest and dont gimp pc games https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8blIojirqFU ubisoft put the consoles first i have not buy one there games since watchdogs i watched the e3 trailer thought wow this games better than gta then when i actually buy the game it was terrible , the divison its got denuvo u can bet it need about 50 patches like all there games do and titan X sli for 60fps 1080p, i registered on geforce experience and i have had 3 emails now from nvidia trying get me buy division pre order , i think lot pc gamers getting fedup with ubisoft saying gotta keep pc parity with consoles but they do it because its makes money crytek give us a beautiful pc game in crysis 3 then went broke so something very weird going on when u make a lovely pc game go broke and ubisoft make crap ports and get rich

I read the post you quoted twice, three times if you include the time when I wrote it. I can't find a single spot in that post where I alluded to Ubisoft being 100% honest. I'm fully aware Ubi has deceived people in the past. But in this particular game, that's what it actually looks like. The beta was literally a week ago. There was a closed beta a few weeks before that. Both had excellent graphics and looked just like this video. So in this particular case, there really is nothing to be skeptical about.

I read the post you quoted twice, three times if you include the time when I wrote it. I can't find a single spot in that post where I alluded to Ubisoft being 100% honest. I'm fully aware Ubi has deceived people in the past. But in this particular game, that's what it actually looks like. The beta was literally a week ago. There was a closed beta a few weeks before that. Both had excellent graphics and looked just like this video. So in this particular case, there really is nothing to be skeptical about.

Its better to be skeptical than to be slapped in the face. I let it happen with so many recent games I will not be fooled again. Also I think its better that people are skeptic, it means Ubisoft has to give it a lot more effort instead of blatant marketing and hyping.

I'm not blaming you for being skeptical. I think that's fine. I'm just saying I would be extremely surprised if the game looked totally different when it's launching three weeks after the beta. Like it would take serious effort on their part to downgrade the game in that time frame.