#5392671

Undying

2017-02-14 11:34

Ah, finally. :P Decent performance overall. Big gap between 470 and 1050ti, different class of cards. I dont see why would anyone want to run this game using dx11 renderer when dx12+async offers more performance even on nvidia cards. Dx12 done right?

#5392675

fantaskarsef

2017-02-14 11:44

Thanks for the review Hilbert, much appreciated.

Dx12 done right?

Yes looks like it indeed. 🙂

#5392678

MaicolVieira

2017-02-14 11:47

Why not put the GTX 970, which is the most used card according to Steam?

#5392679

zer0_c0ol

2017-02-14 12:10

Why not put the GTX 970, which is the most used card according to Steam?

Because it is garbage now

#5392681

Undying

2017-02-14 12:16

Interesting fact on the CPU side. This game performs better on a 6c/6t than 4c/8t CPUs. One more reason to wait for Ryzen. https://s21.postimg.org/b59g1i6iv/Untitled.png

#5392682

Berke53

2017-02-14 12:18

Does this title support Dx12 MultiGPU for Nvidia cards?

#5392686

alanm

2017-02-14 12:28

Thanks Hilbert. So this is more in line with the pcgameshardware results than the GameGPU review.

#5392687

alanm

2017-02-14 12:29

Because it is garbage now

Pure trolling. Its on par with the 470. So the 470 and all below it are garbage too?

#5392688

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2017-02-14 12:31

I'll add a 970 later today, not a problem guys.

#5392692

SirDremor

2017-02-14 12:38

Hawaii GPUs aka GeForce GTX 390

I know a company or two who might be miffed by this 😉

#5392694

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2017-02-14 12:45

I know a company or two who might be miffed by this 😉

Let's pretend I never wrote that okay ? :P)

#5392696

zer0_c0ol

2017-02-14 12:46

Pure trolling. Its on par with the 470. So the 470 and all below it are garbage too?

Well yeah 🙂)

#5392698

Undying

2017-02-14 12:54

Well yeah 🙂)

Careful Zero. Just becouse you have couple of Fury cards does not mean everyhing below it is garbage.

#5392703

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2017-02-14 13:10

FCAT frametime results added.

#5392706

Hilbert Hagedoorn

Administrator

2017-02-14 13:18

As per request, GeForce GTX 970 added.

#5392728

chispy

2017-02-14 13:50

Great review Hilbert. Good to see a title where both camps nvidia and amd video cards do benefit from DX12 and Async compute. This game loves more cores on the cpu side of things , hence 6 core or 8 core CPUs it's the way to go the way i see it. More and more new games do benefit from that , hence in my opinion for people upgrading soon need to understand the sweet spot is 6c12t or 8c12t cpu if you really want to be future proof do not go the 4 core route.

#5392730

coth

2017-02-14 13:53

Didn't know there were electronic glasses and HMD systems in WWII...

#5392733

fantaskarsef

2017-02-14 13:55

Interesting fact on the CPU side. This game performs better on a 6c/6t than 4c/8t CPUs. One more reason to wait for Ryzen.

Or that finally one of the devs makes use of the hexacores that have been around with Intel for so long 🙄 But yeah, first fps that I've seen that seems to like more than four cores for some real advantages.

#5392737

darrensimmons

2017-02-14 14:04

Does this title support Dx12 MultiGPU for Nvidia cards?

Yes indeed it does and it's faster than dx11 sli.

#5392746

TheHeavySoldier

2017-02-14 14:14

1440p GTX Titan X - 116 GTX 1080 - 90 GTX 1070 - 72 R9 Fury X - 71 GTX 980ti - 67 R9 Fury - 66 R9 Nano - 63 4k GTX Titan X - 72 GTX 1080 - 55 R9 Fury X - 49 R9 Fury - 45 R9 Nano - 42 GTX 980ti - 42 GTX 1070 - 40

Ultra HD, UHD or 4K, this resolution refers to approximately 4000 horizontal pixels. Ultra HD resolution has four times the number of pixels of a typical 1920x1080 resolution. This resolution and Ultra quality settings require more memory, hence the cards with more then 4 GB jump ahead. Proper framerates you will achieve with a GeForce GTX 1070. But as we see so often, the Hawaii GPUs aka Radeon R9 390 series certainly still are going strong.

How exactly do the cards with more than 4GB jump ahead? The GTX 1080 and GTX Titan X were already on top. The GTX 1070 (8GB) dropped below the R9 Nano (4GB), the R9 Fury (4GB) jumped ahead of the 980ti (6GB) and both the R9 Fury (4GB) and R9 Fury X (4GB) jumped ahead of the GTX 1070 (8GB). Not to mention the R9 Fury is 100 euros cheaper than the GTX 1070 (both, cheapest versions available, Sapphire Nitro fury for 330 euros and KFA2 GTX 1070 for 429 euros) That conclusion makes no sense at all...