Sixteen Core Ryzen 9 3000 Series Socket AM4 ES Sample at 4.2 GHz spotted?
Click here to post a comment for Sixteen Core Ryzen 9 3000 Series Socket AM4 ES Sample at 4.2 GHz spotted? on our message forum
Clawedge
Intel just pooped it's panties
Undying
Intel 7nm is coming in 2021 so they are not scared. :P
Clawedge
Just like 10 nm that has been coming for the past few years. 🙄
gerardfraser
ES sample 4.2 Ghz boost, so there is a chance for one/two cores 5.0-5.2 Ghz boost.
Rocking 2600X now and works great .Looking forward to 3600X or whatever.
Kaleid
I'm hoping for 8 cores at at least 4.5Ghz.
Koniakki
Could we.... use the early leaks of 2950X ES clocks as any indication or maybe close approximation for final clocks of that new chip?
ES 2950X clocks
Base: 3.4 GHz
XFR: 4.0 GHz
Retail/Final 2950X clocks
Base: 3.5 GHz
XFR: 4.4 GHz
Leaked Zen2 8C/16T ES clocks
Base: 3.30 GHz
XFR: 4.2 GHz
Possible final/retail clocks of Leaked Zen2 8C/16T ES
Base: 3.5-3.6 GHz?
XFR: 4.6-4.7 GHz?
Well, I hope it comes close anw! Also let's not forget to add any possible IPC increases to the clocks. 🙂
Clawedge
None really, just poking fun at a company that is know to be shady and suppress competition, and despite being many many times bigger than AMD, they are just about even when it comes to performance and power consumption.
nevcairiel
Same. 12 core with 4.8 all-core boost would be nice, and if I can dream with some medium-aggressive OC maybe 5.0 all-core OC... 🙂
Jespi
If Ryzen 9 has 16 cores, Ryzen 7 12cores and Ryzen 5 8 cores. Am gonna "downgrade" a product line from my Ryzen 2700 to 3500x. Am purerly gamer and i don't think i will need more than 8/16 by now.
DeskStar
If I read anything like this after the release of them I am going to build a system immediately!!
Shoot if I can get 4.7ghz on all cores in comparison to my 3970K I will be sold as a MOFO!!!
GIMME.... GIMME......GIMME.....
Valken
I would take 8 cores @ 5 + GHZ. Maybe 12 cores if it hits the sweet spot! Money on AMD...
anticupidon
man, too many cores for Windows 10's scheduler to handle.
And I know just the thing to solve this.
Astyanax
?????
windows can handle 16 cores just fine.
anticupidon
the "benefits" of writing on a forum board, people miss your sarcasm/wit along with facial expression.
I was mocking Windows, as it has trouble with Threadripper cores because of its scheduler. Ask Wendel from Level1.;)
Astyanax
your joke failed because it was the 24 and 32 core threadrippers that had any problems.
anticupidon
thanks for letting me know what I already knew.
asturur
i'm waiting the final specs with much anxiety, but i doubt we will see any 5Ghz here in official clocks.
Also 8cores all at 5Ghz sounds hard with overclock too.
We will see!
mackintosh
My baseline remains the same - either it beats the 9900K in daily and gaming use at its pricepoint or it won't. If it does, my next system (and first in over 15 years) will be AMD based. If it won't, I'll keep feeding Chipzilla.
Silva
16 cores on a small socket sure sounds fun, and expensive.
I was going to buy something around a 1600/2600 but I'm ready to take something like a 3600 home now.
Hurry up AMD!
Venix
genuine question here i see a lot of people putting a mental threshold ...like if it hits 5ghz + good if it hits 4999 mhz and bellow bad .... i do not get it ... in gaming for example if you have a chip that can actually hit 5000 mhz and someone say has the same chip and can hit 4.7 ghz with the same video card same motherboard , ram you catch my drift ... will those 300 mhz matter at all ? what kind of difference will make? and even if it does will be only when you are not gpu bound i really do not get it i am just waiting for HH review to see what the cpu can do ... hell even if it clocks at 1hz if the performance is there i am in for it !
