#5493118

morbias

2017-11-17 10:34

lol Is it symmetrical? No? Then what is it?

#5493491

morbias

2017-11-18 12:48

So your argument is - this case which is very obviously asymmetrical should not be described as asymmetrical because cases which are largely symmetrical have some elements which are asymmetrical to a lesser extent. And all cases are asymmetrical anyway, but it's a stretch to call this clearly asymmetrical case asymmetrical. Interesting logic.

#5493757

morbias

2017-11-19 11:22

Sure, you can argue it is neither 'spectacular' or 'audacious' as those are subjective terms, but that it is asymmetrical is an indisputable and objective fact so I'm not sure why you're so earnestly asserting it cannot described as such.

#5493779

sverek

2017-11-19 13:44

asymmetrical eɪsɪˈmɛtrɪkl/ adjective having parts which fail to correspond to one another in shape, size, or arrangement; lacking symmetry.

Yeap, that how this case looks like.

#5493783

scatman839

2017-11-19 13:59

guys calm plz, there are literally more important things in life

#5493784

sverek

2017-11-19 14:02

scatman839:

guys calm plz, there are literally more important things in life

Like what?

#5493833

sykozis

2017-11-19 19:02

And here, I thought it's greatest shortcoming was the lack of 5.25" bay slots that a lot of people still use...... Guess I was wrong....

#5493836

BLEH!

2017-11-19 19:21

For a modern case, that's not as fugly as I thought it would be...