Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Photos and specs

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Photos and specs on our message forum
#5116823
data/avatar/default/avatar35.webp
On the mighty interwebs Sapphire once again leaked info and spec on the non X model of the R9 Fury, the heat-pipe based Radeon R9 Fury.Â*The card has a big triple-slot Tri-X cooler based on what seem ... Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Photos and specs
HH u have it in house 🙂
#5116844
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169351.jpg
Jesus that's massive! If only that's what she said :'(
#5116863
data/avatar/default/avatar39.webp
i am very curious to see how the aircooled temps compare to the AIO temps.
#5116889
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/169/169351.jpg
I would have thought that looking at Tonga, where Sapphire have an ITX version of the card, that we would have seen comparable size cooling solution or even to that of the regular 285/380, I hope this is just the top end cooling solution card that sapphire offer and there there will be a more manageable sized card for the respective price point of the Fury. This card is what'll get lots of sales imo, but if this is what the typical fansink design will have to be, not many people will like the card (thinking of heat dumped inside a system for example, will require good ventilated chassis). There is the nano too though, I wonder where that card will sit in the tiers, will it be 380, 390x, nano, fury, fury x? Or will it be 380, nano etc?
#5116910
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254132.jpg
I would have thought that looking at Tonga, where Sapphire have an ITX version of the card, that we would have seen comparable size cooling solution or even to that of the regular 285/380, I hope this is just the top end cooling solution card that sapphire offer and there there will be a more manageable sized card for the respective price point of the Fury. This card is what'll get lots of sales imo, but if this is what the typical fansink design will have to be, not many people will like the card (thinking of heat dumped inside a system for example, will require good ventilated chassis). There is the nano too though, I wonder where that card will sit in the tiers, will it be 380, 390x, nano, fury, fury x? Or will it be 380, nano etc?
It will be below the Fury or equal to it. Unless they further cut it down from the Fury.
#5116965
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/149/149327.jpg
still no DVI ports ... damn
#5117227
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/105/105139.jpg
I like how everyone is thinking "it's so huge" when it's the same Tri-X cooler that is on the 290/390. Just the size of the PCB makes it seem like it's big.
#5117267
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
Why is the cooler so big though?
#5117282
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
Why is the cooler so big though?
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
#5117300
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
I am just guessing they were too lazy to make a new one for the fury when they had working 3 fan coolers why not use the old ones 😀 But for sure it probably is 250w too.
#5118173
data/avatar/default/avatar04.webp
Color What is up with this yellow color scheme of Sapphire? It's really turning me away from them. What ever happened to the all black or black blue scheme????:stewpid:
#5118316
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/132/132389.jpg
Because it's probably a 250w card, which can't be cooled by a smaller setup.
I've never noticed the fins at the end of a heatsink like that really heating up even when a card is practically on fire. I would bet it would have near the same thermal results with a heatsink that matched the card length.