Samsung releases 28-Inch 4K Monitor UD590
Click here to post a comment for Samsung releases 28-Inch 4K Monitor UD590 on our message forum
maize1951
$700.00 for an 28 inch 4K monitor shows that the prices for 4k monitors is getting more reasonable.
signex
Yea man, can't wait for that!
I could have afforded one a month ago damn, but then i would have had a crappy PC now tho haha.
And it wouldn't run 4K good at all...
Loobyluggs
I'm gonna say this for the people in the cheap seats: that's not 4K, that's quad HD.
It's more like 4xHD, because last time I checked 3840 lines does not equal 4 thousand.
This: link is 4K. You can tell, because the resolution is 4096 × 2160
nice monitor though...
fry178
4k
Yes it is a called 4k screen. Just because its not running the cinemascope aspect ratio used in theaters, doesn't change that.
One of the reasons why sony calls there tvs 4k UltraHD, to separate them from the 4k resolution in theaters.
Doubt it is a native/one panel screen, they still go for around 2500-3000$.
And what is samsung doing 4k wise, besides making panels.
They dont shoot 4k nor have they any other background with it, but claiming to be the leader?!
Like apple trying to sell me a car. Not gonna happen...
yasamoka
For those who are going "awww yiss" now, remember that this is a 28" TN panel.
Want 4K urgently and can put up with TN at huge sizes? Sure.
Loobyluggs
zimzoid
No dvi input, 1ms is nice but it's only a TN hence the cheapish price. Waiting for Asus to release that 1440p display @ 144hz that should do me fine 🙂
signex
Aren't these panels using some kind of IPS panel?
It's a weird name, i can't remember, i've heard the Asus has it and has 1ms response time.
If it does use TN, it won't look good with that size.
darkshadow5k5
educate yourself a bit.
You couldn't be more wrong, 4K originated from cinema and film, UHD is for consumers.
Aspect ratios have nothing to do with it, in fact cinema always had a different aspect ratio than consumer appliances: 16:9 (1.78:1) vs 2.35:1.
4k content is 4096x not 3840x.
Here, Denial
Loobyluggs
Rich_Guy
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18590039
zimzoid
http://www.samsung.com/levant/consumer/computers-peripherals/monitors/led-monitor/LU28D590DS/ZN-spec
Its a TN here you go> signex
Anarion
darkshadow5k5
LG 31MU95....now isn't it curious they have to advertise it as real 4K?
I guess we are going to see 4K and real 4K as different standards now:eyes:, so asinine.
Why? Maybe because of:
So UHD is 4k now because it retains the 16:9 aspect ratio?
Oh no wait, It's not that UHD is 4K, it's that actual 4K isn't because it's not 16:9.
Actually 4K does explicitly imply a resolution of 4096x, just because some hip marketing bureau says otherwise doesn't mean they are right; yes it is an imprecise marketing term, which is exactly why it explicitly implies something else because as quoted earlier, actual 4K content will not fill a UHD display.
You'd need something like an ElementalDragon
Fox2232
lenovo one this month should be 700$ too. Has a lot of features, quite different to this one.
But this PiP looks interesting a bit. If it took 2x 1080p via DP and 2x 1080p via 2x HDMI then you could set up 4 screen eyefinity group and send in 120Hz via each cable if electronics and screen was capable to deliver.
Color question, just because it's TN does not mean it's that bad, color is not bad thing about TN. Bad thing is viewing angle which change color representation as you move around.
Lane
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/179486-samsung-launches-28-inch-4k-billion-color-monitor-for-just-700
Its 3820×2160 @ 60Hz it seems ( DP needed anyway )... But well there's different question about the 10bits, outside PLS and IPS, not so much TN who support the 10bit. ( let alone, i think Nvidia gpu's still dont support it natively ).
Loobyluggs
Press Link
The reduction in resolution (even by a small amount) resulted in a reduction at the manufacturing level by the panel manufacturers, not the monitor producers. Their production lines were configured more for 1080p than the larger 1200p because the demand for 1080p was higher than the demand for 1200p. We can start pointing fingers as to the why, but my money is on the broadcast standards people and entertainment content providers.
My comment is in reference to a comment that poster made - I still do not know what 4K has to do with 16:9 in reference to their reference
Genuine 4096 lines would not require the aspect ratio to be 2.35:1, and LG has announced a 105 Inch 4K tv - although I suspect that it's really for Hotels, exhibitions, departure lounges etc.
This is LCD tech, not Plasma, although I kinda get your point.
As mentioned, it's about the panel production lines and a lower cost of manufacture due to the reduction in pixels required to make the tech.
HDMI 2.0 is either available as a firmware upgrade or simply a new cable - then you got 60Hz.
btw to all: Dell call their monitor range Ultra HD