#4482457

buddybd

2012-12-19 06:45

Another mammoth phone....and what's up with that resolution. That's going to look horrible.

#4482474

PhazeDelta1

2012-12-19 07:18

Now Samsung is just being retarded. The S III and the Note II are much better. Or am I missing something here?

#4482484

naike

2012-12-19 07:33

A fat phone with a soup of pixels as the screen, yay. When will someone start making phones that are normal in size... The lumia 800 has been the closes top phone with normal size for many years.

#4482553

keenan

2012-12-19 09:57

Probably aimed at people that want a "S3/Note" sized phone at a much lower price...

#4482597

Neo Cyrus

2012-12-19 11:09

Probably aimed at people that want a "S3/Note" sized phone at a much lower price...

No doubt, but who wants a 5" screen with 800x480 res? I'd like a cheap 5" phone but I sure as hell am not dropping my res any lower than 720p. I think 720p is just right for a 5-5.5" device. It's a little too much on the SGN which is 4.65".

#4482629

k1net1cs

2012-12-19 12:03

No doubt, but who wants a 5" screen with 800x480 res?

Those who wants cheaper smartphones. Just because you care too much about PPI doesn't mean others do too.

#4482644

StewieTech

2012-12-19 12:28

My 3.5" smartphone has 800x480. A 5" needs a bigger resolution!!

#4482664

Mr.Bigtime

2012-12-19 13:00

Samsung y u no make a powerful small phone.

#4482668

Undying

2012-12-19 13:05

Samsung y u no make a powerful small phone.

They make "mini" versions of it...

#4482670

Mr.Bigtime

2012-12-19 13:10

They make "mini" versions of it...

S3 mini? It doesnt seem like it is powerful 🙁