Hilbert Hagedoorn:

It would be good if Samsung started to label their NAND writing methodology properly, as any responsible company would do. TLC versus MLC is important

Noisiv:

my 850 PRO 256 GB is 7 years old 4.3 years Power ON 47 TB written 91% Health Warranty: 10 years warranty, or 150 TBW, whichever comes first. My warranty will expire 3 years from now having written 45% of 150 TB. So it looks to me that warranty-wise 'years' is more important than 'TB written', because it will expire sooner. I would need 22 years to write 150 TB at current rate.

Hilbert Hagedoorn:

We can wholeheartedly recommend the Samsung 980 500GB and 1TB models,

Robbo9999:

Another decent performing NVMe 3.0 drive, with the most impressive function being it's large pSLC cache that means almost no write holes unless you write a silly huge chunk to the drive.......but otherwise I think you just choose based on capacity & price, the lack of write holes is the stand out feature of this drive though.

Noisiv:

my 850 PRO 256 GB is 7 years old 4.3 years Power ON 47 TB written 91% Health Warranty: 10 years warranty, or 150 TBW, whichever comes first. My warranty will expire 3 years from now having written 45% of 150 TB. So it looks to me that warranty-wise 'years' is more important than 'TB written', because it will expire sooner. I would need 22 years to write 150 TB at current rate.

cucaulay malkin:

what about the mounting hole?

RealNC:

Can you please explain? The Samsung 970 Evo (and even the Evo Plus) are somewhat cheaper at the same capacities. Why are you recommending the 980 and also, why didn't you point out the fact that Samsung themselves have better and at the same time cheaper SSDs than this one? So what exactly did you mean by "value proposition" in your review if this SSD is actually more expensive than Samsung's better SSDs? What "value" are you talking about?

kakiharaFRS:

I never realized smaller drives had lower TBW warranties