Samsung 970 EVO M.2 500GB NVMe SSD review

Memory (DDR4/DDR5) and Storage (SSD/NVMe) 368 Page 1 of 1 Published by

Click here to post a comment for Samsung 970 EVO M.2 500GB NVMe SSD review on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/50/50906.jpg
Wonder why some results are so different from Anand's in respect to WD Black SSD / Sandisk Extreme Pro.
data/avatar/default/avatar26.webp
Just wondering about the launch dates on page 2, weren't the 970 EVO and PRO just released? The table says April 2017 though And yep, still reading to see if Samsung gets even more of my money...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/270/270041.jpg
This worth it over the 960 pro m.2? Or the difference that marginable that you wouldn’t notice the differences in a day to day world?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
The 960 EVO 1TB can be had for €356 which comes out to €0,35/GB vs €0,43/GB(€429). edit: The 960 EVO 500GB comes out €0,38/GB vs €0,44/GB for the 970 EVO 500GB. But obviously the 970 EVO was just released so it commands a 14%(€27) price premium for the 500GB model and 20%(€73) for the 1TB one.
Ricepudding:

This worth it over the 960 pro m.2? Or the difference that marginable that you wouldn’t notice the differences in a day to day world?
As I went from a 950 PRO 256GB to a 960 EVO 500GB recently, I'm inclined to say nill difference noticed in day to day usage.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
And still no protection against data corruption/loss caused by power loss/issues. Not talking about AC power loss here, as a ups covers that. crucial/ocz/toshiba have it, sot is not rocket science and it doesn't cost billions to implement ...
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
It's funny, HDD's even with their fancy advanced technologies ... PMR, Helium, SMR, HAMR or whatever they want to do next... never caught up with interface speed. SATA3 (600MB/s) is still over 200% faster than the fastest harddrives. With SSDs it only took a few years to saturate the SATA3 speed. Now the same thing happens with NVMe... these new Sammys are basically hitting the limit of 4X PCI-e . PCI-e 4.0 can't come soon enough ! (Or something else, beyond PCI-e...)
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/272/272918.jpg
Ricepudding:

This worth it over the 960 pro m.2? Or the difference that marginable that you wouldn’t notice the differences in a day to day world?
Prob not, especially if you're using ramcache too
data/avatar/default/avatar38.webp
wavetrex:

It's funny, HDD's even with their fancy advanced technologies ... PMR, Helium, SMR, HAMR or whatever they want to do next... never caught up with interface speed. SATA3 (600MB/s) is still over 200% faster than the fastest harddrives. With SSDs it only took a few years to saturate the SATA3 speed. Now the same thing happens with NVMe... these new Sammys are basically hitting the limit of 4X PCI-e . PCI-e 4.0 can't come soon enough ! (Or something else, beyond PCI-e...)
Actually thats not true anymore. New Seagate dual actuator drives can double in certain situations throughput of normal drives, which is currently around 240MB/s, giving it teoreticaly up to 480 MB/s.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
@Hilbert Hagedoorn Hey boss, did you get a newer NVMe driver for this review? Version 3.0. If so could you post it?
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
Agent-A01:

Hey boss, did you get a newer NVMe driver for this review?
Yes Sir, v3
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

Yes Sir, v3
Download link pls? 🙂
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
It can go life once Samung has posted it on their website. Last time we posted the v2 software I jumped the gun and posted prior to their public release, and got a world of hurt from Samsung.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/196/196426.jpg
Would be interesting to retest a 960 EVO with the new driver. Perhaps some of the speed in the new model comes from lower driver overhead, and not just from the SSD itself.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/231/231931.jpg
Hilbert Hagedoorn:

It can go life once Samung has posted it on their website. Last time we posted the v2 software I jumped the gun and posted prior to their public release, and got a world of hurt from Samsung.
[youtube=MC9AjN5l4Gs]
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/16/16662.jpg
Administrator
wavetrex:

Would be interesting to retest a 960 EVO with the new driver. Perhaps some of the speed in the new model comes from lower driver overhead, and not just from the SSD itself.
That was checked by me already. The answer is no, it makes no difference.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/216/216490.jpg
Amazon has lowered the price of 960 EVO 500GB to €176 which brings it's cost per GB down to €0,35/GB which again comes out 24,3% cheaper vs €0,44/GB(€220) for the 970 EVO 500GB. Just for those interested. I would say €176 for a 500GB Samsung 960 EVO is a "great" deal.
data/avatar/default/avatar03.webp
Just because it's new, I really want a 970 Pro. But, my 960 Pro is a tad over a year old so I'll not upgrade and chalk it up to money wisely saved.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/189/189438.jpg
Koniakki:

The 960 EVO 1TB can be had for €356 which comes out to €0,35/GB vs €0,43/GB(€429). edit: The 960 EVO 500GB comes out €0,38/GB vs €0,44/GB for the 970 EVO 500GB. But obviously the 970 EVO was just released so it commands a 14%(€27) price premium for the 500GB model and 20%(€73) for the 1TB one. As I went from a 950 PRO 256GB to a 960 EVO 500GB recently, I'm inclined to say nill difference noticed in day to day usage.
Well ive just bought a second Samsung 960 512gb but this time i got an evo to go next to my pro....£145, in the grand scheme of things a couple hundred mb/s is no biggy.