Ryzen 5 3400G & Ryzen 3 3200G Based on AMD Picasso (Gets higher Clock frequency)
Click here to post a comment for Ryzen 5 3400G & Ryzen 3 3200G Based on AMD Picasso (Gets higher Clock frequency) on our message forum
Vananovion
AMD's naming scheme is getting really confusing.
Btw. It would be nice if they squeezed in a couple more Vega CUs in there. More efficient process should allow that, power-wise.
Kaarme
SHS
If the above is true then the new Ryzen 5 3400G and Ryzen 3 3200G ain't much of diff the older one, Where the info the
Ryzen 3 3300G 6 / 12 Navi (15 CU)
Ryzen 5 3600G 8 / 16 Navi (20 CU)
Undying
This is not the true zen2 core.
Loophole35
Undying
Fox2232
APUs need 7nm + AM5 socket for faster memory. 2400G was OKish for 1080p gaming on decent details in most cases, but modern games mostly run around 50~80fps on average with reasonable sacrifices.
Then there were cases where even lowest details could not deliver anywhere near 60fps and 720p is not comfortable option either due to too low IQ.
But 20CUs on GPU and faster memory is another story. Anyone remembers that Subor Z+ with 24CUs on GPU? That was enough to play modern games well on 1080p with quite good details.
(Btw. they are out of business or something now.)
Loophole35
Fox2232
schmidtbag
Loophole35
icedman
This will be the same as the 1600-2600 or the 1700-2700 couple hundred mhz extra but the power consumption will most likely be slightly higher as well. As for GPU size at this time AMD probably figures it isn't worth adding more GPU power till more bandwidth is available.
GeniusPr0
icedman