Ryse: Son of Rome System Requirements Updated

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Ryse: Son of Rome System Requirements Updated on our message forum
#4908357
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/252/252888.jpg
Wow, I hope recommended specs mean 60fps @ 1440p! Pretty insane... I honestly wonder how many "consumers/regular people" are going to be able to run this.
#4908364
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
Examples: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660Ti or AMD Radeon 260x or 7850
I think they meant 650ti or may be 270x here .
#4908365
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/232/232240.jpg
You'd think CryTek had learned to say something about ratios of cores-to-math'cos by now …
#4908381
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/211/211933.jpg
Why does 4k need a better CPU than recommended?
#4908383
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
You'd think CryTek had learned to say something about ratios of cores-to-math'cos by now …
Don't they have other problems? :bugeye: Well when I build my new system, I'll consider this game for the looks, but with my current rig I wouldn't even bother trying to run that on acceptable iq.
#4908396
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198862.jpg
Why does 4k need a better CPU than recommended?
Marketing.
#4908399
data/avatar/default/avatar37.webp
I played this game on the Xbone when it came out - it was crap.
#4908424
data/avatar/default/avatar34.webp
System requirements are perfectly fine These system requirements aren't that much different from Crysis 3. Crysis 3 did run great on a HD5870 1GB at 1080P. Cryengine 3 is the best game engine currently, everbody that's bitching about it has totally forgotten how much detail is pushed to the screen. Even today Crysis 3 on "low" settings looks better than most games...
#4908432
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/202/202673.jpg
An Intel dual core running four threads or a quad AMD running at roughly double the Xbone's octocore's clock...seems fair enough.
#4908470
data/avatar/default/avatar01.webp
odd choice for a PC port - didn't the XBONE version flop??
#4908496
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/230/230424.jpg
Thats why its coming to PC, cash cow.
#4908498
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/258/258664.jpg
I suppose it's easy to port too, because the Cryengine basically should be easy to set up on a PC, no?
#4908581
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/246/246442.jpg
How many other third party xbone "exclusives" will come out on PC in the upcoming months. After the horrible port dead rising 3 and ryse I reckon there will be a few of them. Sunset overdrive anyone, what about quantum break? I wouldn't mind quantum break actually, I enjoyed every single remedy game to date and they did an awesome job on the pc port for alan wake too so I would be very happy if they would release the game on PC 🙂
#4908620
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/254/254725.jpg
GPU: DirectX 11 graphics card with 4 GB video RAM Examples: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780/ Titan or AMD Radeon 290x
Please direct me to where I might download this extra GB of video memory :P. I wonder if they'll fix it down the line and specify the 6GB 780.
#4908642
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
it'll use more vram at 1080 with ultra textures, actually it'll prolly pass 3gb at 1080 with ultra textures. 2gb will make it playable is all.
#4908651
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
i can see the uber textures used is all, you know where these uber vram textures are kept? in the vram.
#4908703
data/avatar/default/avatar02.webp
i can see the uber textures used is all, you know where these uber vram textures are kept? in the vram.
They arent of noticable higher quality than crysis 3 though, and that game stayed within 2gb with highest quality textures.
#4908709
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/243/243536.jpg
aliens were ok, soldiers were too however for me it was the particle effects in c3 that stood out, imo ryse has much better looking textures, just my opinion is all.