Ryse: Son of Rome Heading to PC with 4K Support
Click here to post a comment for Ryse: Son of Rome Heading to PC with 4K Support on our message forum
Phuncz
Who cares about 4K when it will undoubtibly be a console port. *cough* Watch Dogs *cough*
4K or rather UHD, because 4K is 4096x2160 (not 16:9) is just the support for a resolution, it's not like they are rewriting half their engine for it.
Roman9441
it interesting game for me but some how full HD for me is enough i don't have enough power pc for 4k and even i have i will not spend that much money on PC 🙂
dbogss
4k or not ,i was curious about this game and i am happy that it comes to pc....cytek wants to come out to the surface ,i do not know about that... ,but i do belive that it will make a good benchmark and its good to see that more so called exclusive games come to PC...same as gta5):banana::vader:the fight against console has begun...just joking ,all have goods and bads:bigsmile:
mansonfamily
4k is 3840 × 2160, so it is 16:9
Loobyluggs
wow! A game using 4,096x4,096 textures? Oh, wait...
/sarcasm off
So, just regular 1K textures with a slider to LET people select the resolution their monitor is in upto 2160P.
Jeebies, talk about squeezing the most boring piece of information to attempt to make the news and, lets be honest here; it's hardly remarkable is it?
Phuncz
No it is not:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution
The correct term is UHD, not 4K. I know, not a big deal, but I was not wrong to point it out.
PNeV
I heard this was all style and no substance anyway?
gocorinthians
Crytek...Steam please!
H83
What´s the point??? this game is garbage?!
Smooth Operator
UHD is meant to be the industry standard for 3840x2160p screens, however I think you will find many of the manufacturers refer to their screens as 4K for marketing purposes despite them not being the cinema standard of 4096x2160, which is where 2K, 4K, 5K etc, originated.
Given that in the consumer space the only products I'm aware of which have the cinema standard resolution are the 4K Sony Projectors, I think it's fair game to use 4K or UHD when referring to 3840x2160 screens.
War child
Trying to save Crytek i suppose. Don't think it will take off well for PC when Xbox was such a flop
Domhq
Quote:
Originally Posted by mansonfamily View Post
4k is 3840 × 2160, so it is 16:9
No it is not:
Quote:
4K has become the common consumer friendly name for ultra high definition television (UHDTV) but technically it is not 4K. Consumer 4K resolution of 3840 x 2160 (at a 16:9, or 1.78:1 aspect ratio) differs from the industry standard of 4096 x 2160 (at a 1.9:1 aspect ratio).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution
The correct term is UHD, not 4K. I know, not a big deal, but I was not wrong to point it out.
List of True 16:9 Resolutions
http://pacoup.com/2011/06/12/list-of-true-169-resolutions/
Corbus
Hah...they can keep it.
bigfutus
I hope they will blame piracy for low sales 😀
makaveli316
Who cares about ultra hd when this game has ultra short campaign.
Calmmo
WHO CARES ABOUT 4k ?? OMG
I on the other hand am uber excited about getting the chance to play a kinect QTE game.
Oh wait - I meant I feel like 😛uke2: even thinking about it http://static-cdn.jtvnw.net/jtv_user_pictures/chansub-global-emoticon-ddc6e3a8732cb50f-25x28.png
AbjectBlitz
Any games coming to PC is great news, but marketing support for a resolution as anything special? LOL
Ryu5uzaku
And some disagree. I will buy it for pc. Even tho I am getting X1 and PS4... Cause while it might be repetitive like most games it is something I want to experience myself.
DarkOneZ13
How about something interesting & substantial like that "Nvidia Shield Tablet" review?
Prince Valiant
It's good to see I'm not alone on this. A little surprising to see this is getting a retail release.
