Rumor/Leak 8350k is very close to 7700k in multi-threaded performance

#5466063

Dazz

2017-08-24 18:07

1GB L2 cache 256KB per core? How many cores this thing got 😉 i think it's 1MB L2.

#5466070

waltc3

2017-08-24 18:16

So, er, is Intel planning to dump its i7's in favor of i3's...? Somehow, that doesn't seem at all likely. 😎

#5466081

Loophole35

2017-08-24 18:38

The

waltc3:

So, er, is Intel planning to dump its i7's in favor of i3's...? Somehow, that doesn't seem at all likely. 😎

The leaked 8700k CPU-Z shots I've seen show almost 1600x multi scoring. [spoiler] http://www.overclock.net/content/type/61/id/3095220/ [/spoiler] Now this is the old bench so it doesn't compare to the 8350k score above. 1600x http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=articles&action=file&id=30158 Edit: didn't realize the the above screen shot was so big.

#5466085

evilos

2017-08-24 19:07

my old i7 4790k 4.6GHZ in cpuz scored 501points for single core performance, multithread performance score is 2534points

#5466118

Raider0001

2017-08-24 20:57

http://imgur.com/download/nLcdAa9 Here is my i5 6600 non k running ddr3...

#5466136

JamesSneed

2017-08-24 21:35

My Ryzen 1800x at 3.9Ghz with 3200Mhz Ram scores 447 and 4776 on the latest CPU-Z bench.

#5466144

airbud7

2017-08-24 22:30

renaming scheme...i5 is now i3...i3 is now Pentium and so on...that is all.

#5466150

Ryu5uzaku

2017-08-24 22:49

I am guessing it does not show the boost frequency for the cpu. As with 6700k and 7700k.

#5466154

airbud7

2017-08-24 22:59

Ryu5uzaku:

I am guessing it does not show the boost frequency for the cpu. As with 6700k and 7700k.

it's still equal to what we always called an i5....except this is Coffee Lake i5 with a i3 sticker. i3 will be intels quad core processor with Coffee Lake

#5466184

MegaFalloutFan

2017-08-25 00:08

This "peasant" i3 is faster than my 4.5Ghz overclocked 5820K 474SC & 2775MC (HT:OFF) in 1.80.1. Im defiantly moving to i7-8700K with delid and WC its going to overclock like crazy.

#5466185

Loophole35

2017-08-25 00:15

Ryu5uzaku:

I am guessing it does not show the boost frequency for the cpu. As with 6700k and 7700k.

i3 has no "boost" state.

#5466189

airbud7

2017-08-25 00:24

MegaFalloutFan:

This "peasant" i3 is faster than my 4.5Ghz overclocked 5820K 474SC & 2775MC (HT:OFF) in 1.80.1. Im defiantly moving to i7-8700K with delid and WC its going to overclock like crazy.

Yea^....8700K gonna be one hell of a gaming chip....What the cost gonna be though?

#5466190

Loophole35

2017-08-25 00:36

airbud7:

Yea^....8700K gonna be one hell of a gaming chip....What the cost gonna be though?

Appears to be around the $350-370 mark.

#5466191

MegaFalloutFan

2017-08-25 00:37

Ryu5uzaku:

I am guessing it does not show the boost frequency for the cpu. As with 6700k and 7700k.

airbud7:

Yea^....8700K gonna be one hell of a gaming chip....What the cost gonna be though?

Its going to cost just like any previous mainstream i7 and defiantly less than 389USD

#5466192

MegaFalloutFan

2017-08-25 00:42

Loophole35:

Appears to be around the $350-370 mark.

if Intel sees AMD as actual rival, they will price match Mainstream Ryzen CPUs, if not then at least it will cost somewhat less than last year comparable series, meaning that 8700K will cost for sure 10-20$ less than 7700K

#5466195

Loophole35

2017-08-25 00:50

MegaFalloutFan:

if Intel sees AMD as actual rival, they will price match Mainstream Ryzen CPUs, if not then at least it will cost somewhat less than last year comparable series, meaning that 8700K will cost for sure 10-20$ less than 7700K

I doubt they will match. Remember all of the mainstream Intel CPU's have iGPU's in them. They cost more to produce than Ryzen. Not that that is a good thing. As much as they threw shade at AMD over "glueing" dies together. It's obviously a more cost effective method with little performance impact.

#5466198

FeDaYin

2017-08-25 01:19

4 cores from Intel are very close to 4 cores from Intel WOW, I didn't expected that.

#5466204

airbud7

2017-08-25 01:36

MegaFalloutFan:

if Intel sees AMD as actual rival, they will price match Mainstream Ryzen CPUs, if not then at least it will cost somewhat less than last year comparable series, meaning that 8700K will cost for sure 10-20$ less than 7700K

Bro...it has six cores and multi-threaded performance also jumps by just over 51 percent over 7700K ....its gonna cost more/ if it only cost $320-350....then AMD is screwed again...and all ryzen buyers will say....?

#5466216

user1

2017-08-25 03:07

airbud7:

Bro...it has six cores and multi-threaded performance also jumps by just over 51 percent over 7700K ....its gonna cost more/ if it only cost $320-350....then AMD is screwed again...and all ryzen buyers will say....?

Will be ok , if amd can sell a full 8 core chip at 330$ at launch day, they can drop the price, still very very interesting that they appear to have moved the launch for coffee lake from q2 2018, if it launches this year it will be quite the change in attitude. if it does launch in early 2018, by that point, it will be the latter half of 1st gen ryzen's market life before new 7nm chips show up, having already well established its self. too late really for coffee lake to have stopped ryzen's roll, hell if it launched tomorrow it would probably be too late for intel to stop the momentum am4 has accumulated.

#5466221

icedman

2017-08-25 03:24

This is exciting now with ryzen and Intel finally putting out reasonable upgrades for all of us stuck on quad cores