2/3 of the price for 3/4 of the performance of a 4060ti. Price/performance scaling at its finest. Almost feels like price fixing at this point
Otherwise great review as always boss
It's a weird card. It competes with 4060 Ti here and there. It competes with 6700 XT here and there. Whilst being cheaper. Then it drops off and competes with 6600 XT ish and is tiny bit cheaper. So well ok. Still would say better for the price then 4060 ti even tho it's not a good card.
Perf per dollar it's the easily strongest of the new cards tho from top to bottom
LOL...uses more power than 4060Ti and 30% slower, it's an utter failure of a card
From other sources same power. But alas they are on a bigger node still. Among other things. Anyway it's objectively for the price any worse then 4060 Ti. And perf dollar it is some 25% better.
But basically this should be sub 200€ whilst 4060 Ti should be around 250-300 territory.
edit:
No wonder about the power consumption as AMD decided to go to 6N on this. Not even the 5 they had with 7900 which is still worse then nvidias 4.
As evident here if it was actually 200$ it would start to make a lot more sense.
It's because of stuff like this that AMD got a 64% drop in revenue in the client divisions.
well they spent all their R&D budget on MCM, which couldn't even get them anywhere near AD102, meanwhile the RDNA3's architecture is just the same as RDNA2 in term of efficiency
well they spent all their R&D budget on MCM, which couldn't even get them anywhere near AD102, meanwhile the RDNA3's architecture is just the same as RDNA2 in term of efficiency
The chiplet tech has already been paid for by the CPU division. It's one of the main reasons AMD managed to steal market share from Intel.
It's use on RDNA3 is good and enables AMD to cut costs. But the rest of RDNA3 evolved very little of significance.
At $300 it's DOA indeed.
At $200 however it's a nice E-sports/casual gamer card.
At $250 it's very meh still, I'd rather grab a discounted 6700XT or even better, the 10 GB versions which are cheaper.
Looks like AMD realized in the very last second that $300 is complete DOA.
However, $270 is not any better, this is still way too much and basically price/performance stagnation. At least it's not regression like the higher end products from NV.
I was maybe considering one of these for the living room PC, but nah, f0ck it, this is pathetic. I'll just upgrade the old RX 570 in there next generation (maybe, if there's a solid uplift, not like this crappy stagnation we're experiencing now)
for price point it great, atlest AMD get that, nvidia want to charge more fore new gen by quite bit for performance on pair to last gen, well less you much higher price cards..
IF i had to buy new card cause 1070ti died i would probably by this just cause the price it self is actual what should be imo for this class. but gen to gen this pathetic in general AMD/Nvidia
DLSS and FG mean nothing to me, they have there usage but should never be use as crutch for real performance which what has happen seem to. nvidia purposely castrating there cards and show almost all there charts with DLSS and DLSS and FG on and then claiming 2x performance vs last gen, which only true for game the support it and is not true x2 performance gain for most there card then gen (except really stupidly price cards) they match the last gen equivalent
I might be for most part loyal to intel and nvidia but BS is BS special when it come to pricing and nvidia has gona full on BS mode
As evident here if it was actually 200$ it would start to make a lot more sense.