Radeon Pro Vega 56 graphics processor with 8GB of HBM2 memory

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Radeon Pro Vega 56 graphics processor with 8GB of HBM2 memory on our message forum
#5439584
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/268/268848.jpg
Look - Thanks to AMD's competition you can get now Up-To 18 Xeon Cores in your iMac! Do you think Apple gonna pay Intel over $2500 for it- LOL NO! I am sure that in next big Refresh Apple going for AMD's EPYC. Soon Thunderbolt 3 royalty-free and Bye Bye Intel WalletRipper and Extremely harder to cool Intel `18C!.
#5439597
data/avatar/default/avatar12.webp
thats a grand way to reduce the value of an apple product
#5439624
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/175/175902.jpg
thats a grand way to reduce the value of an apple product
sadly not at all... would you buy an Apple if not over expensive 🙂 ? Apple is always more AMD than NVidia since long time BTW.
#5439636
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/237/237771.jpg
sadly not at all... would you buy an Apple if not over expensive 🙂 ? Apple is always more AMD than NVidia since long time BTW.
No use bro. He has proven over the last few weeks he is just a blind anti-AMD troll. Bumest to just place in ignore.
#5439654
data/avatar/default/avatar14.webp
Quite the driver dev there.
#5439662
data/avatar/default/avatar36.webp
Cannot wait for us mere mortals to be able to purchase Vega!
#5439679
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/237/237771.jpg
Anyone concerned with the low ROP count?
#5439692
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/156/156133.jpg
Moderator
Anyone concerned with the low ROP count?
It's not made for gaming so would this really have a huge effect on pro applications?
#5439695
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/237/237771.jpg
It's not made for gaming so would this really have a huge effect on pro applications?
Doubt the gaming variety will have a higher count as AMD does not have the capital to create separate gaming a professional GPU's.
#5439708
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/164/164033.jpg
Anyone concerned with the low ROP count?
It should be fine considering 32 ROP is not limiting factor on 480 and 580 vs 290x with 64.
#5439724
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/259/259654.jpg
Anyone concerned with the low ROP count?
It's not really low, and AMD cards have historically no issues with ROPs (see good performance in high resolutions). It's polygon count and shader utilization that bites them back. Even so, with some optimizations and the higher frequencies the fillrate should be ~GTX 1080, which is actually high, considering how almost all older architectures have had lower fillrates with no real issue.