QD-OLED = stop-gap tech. Wait for QNED, unless you change TVs every 3-4 years.
[youtube=PBsypagxxCI]
QNED as in LGs not as good as Samsung mini LED TVs you mean?
Samsung are also launching "The Wall" true microLED in sizes down to 76" next year if you want the real future now. At a stratospheric cost of course.
You'll be waiting a long time for those to be priced competitively. 🙂 My only issue with Samsung's TVs is that they have ads while also lacking support for Dobly Vision. So unless these offer a significant advantage over current Oleds then I'll be sticking with LG or Philips. 🙂
a brighter oled ? 😱 you must be blind like Linus Tech Tips that so love garbage HDR to want that
current oleds are already so bright that once I physically held my arm in front of my eyes as if trying to block the sun because of those stupid eye piercing ultra white completely irrealistic and vision destroying lights HDR movies have
who wants that ? you must have some kind of Icarus complex to want or need more than a soccer field ligthing in your face on your tv
and don't tell me you know better you really don't
HDR reminds me of video game "reshades" post-processed screen filters, they look brilliant in some scenes but awful in others, in the end it does remove the original vision of the movie most of the time rather than add something
"The panels are printed using the inkjet process, and during production it uses sensors to detect how many nanorod LEDs are in the ink, the viscosity of the solvent, and the number of nanorod LEDs sprayed onto the substrate. The pixels are then self-aligned using an electric signal. Their alignment state is carefully analysed using more sensors to ensure this is done accurately."
That is just amazing... they actually spray the LEDs in blobs of liquid onto the glass like an inkjet printer... I can't get my head around how such a process even works!
a brighter oled ? 😱 you must be blind like Linus Tech Tips that so love garbage HDR to want that
current oleds are already so bright that once I physically held my arm in front of my eyes as if trying to block the sun because of those stupid eye piercing ultra white completely irrealistic and vision destroying lights HDR movies have
who wants that ? you must have some kind of Icarus complex to want or need more than a soccer field ligthing in your face on your tv
and don't tell me you know better you really don't
HDR reminds me of video game "reshades" post-processed screen filters, they look brilliant in some scenes but awful in others, in the end it does remove the original vision of the movie most of the time rather than add something
Have my displays and TV calibrated between 120-150 cd/m2 and happy with that. So I'm not cheerleading for brighter displays or the HDR trend in the market. But much of the industry is and HDR has its adherents. So I wouldnt presume or dictate what others want and declare yourself the sole arbiter of whats good or not for everyone. Whatever you have and are content with is not necessarily a universal rule. Maybe wise to keep that in mind.
They have to respond with something because their micro-led offering was to cost an arm AND a leg.
Funny though they're using OLED as their format of choice though. As they slammed the tech for years because they weren't able to touch the panels until recently from LG.
Shame on LG also for letting their proprietary tech be bettered by others because of being lackadaisical. IE: Brighter panels driven by better cooling.
Honestly though I have been loving my OLED for quite a few years here...
QD-OLED = stop-gap tech. Wait for QNED, unless you change TVs every 3-4 years.
[youtube=PBsypagxxCI]
By the way LG took the QNED name for their line of 2021 mini led backlit TV's so now we have to be very precise or it turns into word soup. Samsung is developing Quantum Dot Nanorod Emitting Diode which is similar to OLED but should be a big improvement on brightness and burn in.
Have my displays and TV calibrated between 120-150 cd/m2 and happy with that. So I'm not cheerleading for brighter displays or the HDR trend in the market. But much of the industry is and HDR has its adherents. So I wouldn't presume or dictate what others want and declare yourself the sole arbiter of whats good or not for everyone. Whatever you have and are content with is not necessarily a universal rule. Maybe wise to keep that in mind.
I have dual needs. I have something similar in my bedroom with a nice 48 inch Sonly master OLED but my living room is so bright and open with windows from various rooms allowing light in.
I would love a brighter OLED with a really good antiglare coating for this room.
You mean QNED-OLED or something? As QNED is already out and being worse then OLED.
Yeah LG took that name for there 2021 mini led backlit TV's. I honestly think LG did that to mess with Samsung because Samsung started QLED branding right after OLED came out to confuse the average consumer.
a brighter oled ? 😱 you must be blind like Linus Tech Tips that so love garbage HDR to want that
current oleds are already so bright that once I physically held my arm in front of my eyes as if trying to block the sun because of those stupid eye piercing ultra white completely irrealistic and vision destroying lights HDR movies have
who wants that ? you must have some kind of Icarus complex to want or need more than a soccer field ligthing in your face on your tv
and don't tell me you know better you really don't
HDR reminds me of video game "reshades" post-processed screen filters, they look brilliant in some scenes but awful in others, in the end it does remove the original vision of the movie most of the time rather than add something
I tested HDR on my Samsung G7, and also some top tier TVs .
I can honestly say : It's TRASH.
It's unrealistic garbage that burns my eyes.
On current OLEDs you have to drop brightness to like 40% to even watch in dark room without your eyes bleeding out.
I tested HDR on my Samsung G7, and also some top tier TVs .
I can honestly say : It's TRASH.
It's unrealistic garbage that burns my eyes.
On current OLEDs you have to drop brightness to like 40% to even watch in dark room without your eyes bleeding out.
i also have a G7 but i know that it's unrealistic and a work around to true HDR
true HDR makes everything better, but to be better you have to have a true black, which only OLED (currently) has.
i have an OLED in my living room and after 3 decades working for a premier electronics manufacturer i cannot stress enough how important black is. OLED is HDR by definition, not just an overused spec. term bandied about.
gray is where all other monitors start out at and why GtG is a spec in gaming monitors.
when you have black you all of a sudden have the nuances found in life (irrespective of your chroma settings) and only OLED delivers that at an affordable (by comparison) price.
brightness of the pc display started out as the way to increase the contrast ratio as black was unattainable (which is a fact) and the marketing department needed a bullet point.
PC displays are too bright in the wrong spectrum of light and that's also a fact. the simple truth is "white" light is cheaper and easier to deploy than color correct light(s). and that's why CRT monitors hung around for as long as they did (despite having too much blue, it was less than LCD backlights) especially in content creation and production.
i also have a G7 but i know that it's unrealistic and a work around to true HDR
true HDR makes everything better, but to be better you have to have a true black, which only OLED (currently) has.
i have an OLED in my living room and after 3 decades working for a premier electronics manufacturer i cannot stress enough how important black is. OLED is HDR by definition, not just an overused spec. term bandied about.
gray is where all other monitors start out at and why GtG is a spec in gaming monitors.
when you have black you all of a sudden have the nuances found in life (irrespective of your chroma settings) and only OLED delivers that at an affordable (by comparison) price.
brightness of the pc display started out as the way to increase the contrast ratio as black was unattainable (which is a fact) and the marketing department needed a bullet point.
PC displays are too bright in the wrong spectrum of light and that's also a fact. the simple truth is "white" light is cheaper and easier to deploy than color correct light(s). and that's why CRT monitors hung around for as long as they did (despite having too much blue, it was less than LCD backlights) especially in content creation and production.
When you have true black, contrast also jumps off the chart. For me its crazy noticeable being able to the read the test/guides on screen with not perfect eyesight. I also love how true black also adds a feeling of depth almost like its 3D.
I tested HDR on my Samsung G7, and also some top tier TVs .
I can honestly say : It's TRASH.
It's unrealistic garbage that burns my eyes.
On current OLEDs you have to drop brightness to like 40% to even watch in dark room without your eyes bleeding out.
That monitor has slightly better contrast than average at 2500:1 since its a VA panel but I'm not sure I would worry about HDR on something like that. You really want great contrast in a monitor/TV for HDR along with the increased color spectrum. HDR is awesome on an OLED TV.
That monitor has slightly better contrast than average at 2500:1 since its a VA panel but I'm not sure I would worry about HDR on something like that. You really want great contrast in a monitor/TV for HDR along with the increased color spectrum. HDR is awesome on an OLED TV.
Sadly we don't have oled monitors . That g7 was closest best i could get
Oled tv are of course top. But i seen hdr on them, looked unrealistic to me.
Especially in dark room was crazy bright.
Without hdr was realistic enough...
back on topic... as discussed Samsung's "OLED" is not equal to LG's OLED, it's a work-around at a lower cost of manufacture.
technically, i find it very interesting and a "tip-of-the-hat" to the Sammy engineer who first brought this up.
i'm very curious about what the energy level in the QDs is before the excitation state and whether or not that it's fully beyond perception because i'm uncertain whether or not things i've seen are artefacts or not.
also way-to-go Samsung for rescuing your orphan child of OLED technology (of course, after none of the metaphorical spaghetti on the wall has stuck otherwise).
it isn't to the full spectrum standard of LG OLED, but if the QDs work well enough to lure Sony (currently using LG OLED)
i'll look at it. it could also be equally true that this is for a lower price point than the Sony LG panel with greater margin
HDR reminds me of video game "reshades" post-processed screen filters, they look brilliant in some scenes but awful in others, in the end it does remove the original vision of the movie most of the time rather than add something