PlayStation 3 emulator increases its CPU performance by 30% with AVX-512
Click here to post a comment for PlayStation 3 emulator increases its CPU performance by 30% with AVX-512 on our message forum
Agonist
I swear, this emulator is built by intel fanboys.
cucaulay malkin
wait until zen4 gets avx512 and intel disables it.
intel and amd fanboys are exactly the same idiots.
Fender178
Yeah it is always nice to see improvements like this with any emulator.
PS2 emulation is awesome on PC better than anything that Sony is trying to do currently. Hell Sony's PS2 emulator on PS3 is miles better than anything they are trying to do right now.
-Tj-
I have avx512 on my rocketlake, will I use it nah, not to play ps3 games lol, i rather play something more modern, thx.
Ivrogne
What do you mean? PS2 emulator has been near perfect for a long time ago. I always play with it back then in Uni days with my cheap i3 2xxx laptop and it ran smooth af in higher resolution than native. Ah miss those old days.
As a long time emulator enjoyer, I don't think so. They will use every tool available, as long as it will help to increase the performance, they will use it. Be it from Intel, AMD, or Nvidia, doesn't matter. No need to point finger.
They even use an android phone to emulate motion control on Wii and Switch emulator on PC, are you going to say that they're an android fanboys too? No, right?
Exactly
Typhon Six Six Six
my POS 11900kf has AVX 512.
Typhon Six Six Six
It's good for ppl who never played PS3. I was on XBOX 360 and PC 120hz back then. Now I wanna play all the God Of Wars games on emulator.
nizzen
I didn't talk about new chips 🙂
So if you bough 12900k the last 9 months, it will have avx 512 support.
People that WANT avx 512 support most likely bought it already. If not, there is no problem getting it in stock now.
Astyanax
avx 512 is pointless on consumer desktop.
cucaulay malkin
i wonder
if you took 12900k avx on vs off
and tested both in the whole guru3d review suite
how much difference would you see
nizzen
If you mean Avx 512, I would say 0% 🙂
Avx 512 is useless if the programs doesn't support it.
cucaulay malkin
what about regular avx1/2 ?
my 10700f has avx2
aufkrawall2
I tried that with Assassin's Creed Odyssey benchmark in 720p and was surprised by how much AVX + AVX2 boosted frame rate: ~0%
Btw: AVX512 greatly helps dav1d AV1 decoding performance with my Rocket Lake CPU. But it's of course pointless with AV1 hardware decoding.
Alessio1989
They already provide some boost against SSE4.1. Biggest difference still remains SSE2 vs SSE4.1. Last video RPCS3 youtube official account uploaded (1 month ago) used i9 12900K @5.2GHz with AVX-512 enabled and E-Cores disabled (that's why the big difference vs ryzen).
cucaulay malkin
I think cp2077 can benefit more
Alessio1989
I don't see how a GPU limited game can benefit on having CPU 512-bit SIMD support :V
Agonist
Says the dweeb constantly in the FSR thread doing everything to piss all over a free option that is open.
You can deepthroat your opinions on it all you want. Its god damn annoying.
You literally can go jerk off with your DLSS fangirl.
You literally spend countless hours, countless days arguing with anyone who does not agree with you, even when they have a very solid counter argument.
Time to put your shit back on ignore list.
I hate fanboys, especially daft asses like you who pretend not to be one.
cucaulay malkin
lol
what a wuss
Undying
Not only benefit but you cant even start some games without avx instructions.
Mostly ubisoft games like AC, WD, The Crew but others as well... Death Stranding, Diablo 2R, Age of Emprires 4, Star Citizen and so on.
nizzen
And frostbite engine using avx 🙂
