Official requirements for new 8K standard published
Click here to post a comment for Official requirements for new 8K standard published on our message forum
devastator
its really 4k let me explain this 1920x(1080) was 1080 they used the second number then came 1440p 2560x(1440) second number again starting from 4k 3840x2160 they started useing the first number instead of the second because of marketing and 4k sounded better then saying it was 2k same goes for 8k 7680x4320 so what are your thoughts on this guys and girls 🙂
Glottiz
8K is peasant resolution. With upcoming 128K you will really be able to see finer detail.
GeniusPr0
FeDaYin
I wonder when LG will release real 4K TVs, let alone 8K.
Undying
Who cares about these 8K monitors when DF said CRT are the best looking.
Fender178
NewTRUMP Order
Voxvalve
schmidtbag
Loobyluggs
nK
n = multiple expressed by a number
k = 1,024
4K = 4,096
8K = 8,192
Fortunately, they are not calling it 4K/8K - they are calling it UHD4K/UHD8K.
The only problem is, people are referring to them as 4K/8K, when they are completely incorrect when doing so and, make themselves look pretty stoopid when they do.
I have no issues with 1080P, and kinda wish they just carrired on with that; so 2160P/4320P, that would have been fine and accurate.
craycray
Fender178
schmidtbag
EspHack
when will the refresh rate race start? i think even at over 1khz refresh there are more benefits than doubling res over what you already cant discern from a reasonable distance
Embra
3.8K is almost as easy to say and remember as 4k is.
Loobyluggs
anticupidon
What about the content?
Putting the carriage before the horses?
ladcrooks
anticupidon
Depending on the zone where the follicles are and also depending on the positions.;)
Denial