Well these are interesting numbers ,

I don't see a price tag?

Your unborn son, 2 kidneys and liver.

Your unborn son, 2 kidneys and liver.

and that's just the down payment.

Something this fast MIGHT be useful for a workstation, but I personally would rather just buy 64GB of RAM and do a RAM disk. As a linux user, RAM disks are easy to set up, and free. On a desktop PC there is no practical use for this, and we get WAY too many SATA ports anyway. My main rig's motherboard is roughly 5 years old and has 10 SATA ports, 6 of which are SATA III. If I really needed raw disk performance at a large capacity, I'd rather just fill up all of my SATA III ports with RAID. Since SSDs are much less prone to failure, you could do RAID 0 for all of them. Then with any remaining SATA II ports (which most boards would have) you could just have a single 1TB or 2TB hard drive that you perform weekly or monthly backups to, which most people do anyway when they care about their data.

Let's see the endurance and general performance first. In my experience over the years I had problems with every OCZ drive. Be it firmware or the drive's controller, I always ended up RMAing the drives.

i want one

I want one too, though i am sure the price will drive me away

I mean who wouldn't want a 3.2tb PCI-e SSD even if it is 20k.

I mean who wouldn't want a 3.2tb PCI-e SSD even if it is 20k.

The issue is having the 20K to spare :banana: