ASUS product page ROG Swift PG65 Goes Up
Click here to post a comment for ASUS product page ROG Swift PG65 Goes Up on our message forum
dfsdfs1112
Why buy old technology?
There is no HDMI 2.1
Not specified who produces the screen? Chinese?
There is no details for screen quality or clear price ?
Watch out for a lot of things NVIDIA has failed and is not a maker of screens
alanm
fry178
guess a lot didnt care to read the title:
big format GAMING. not a (desk) monitor, not htpc screen.
so no need for HDR (how many games have it now? how many in the next year/2/5?
by the time that is really being used, i think most will have already replaced this one.
movies have DV, not games, so no need to support that either, at least i wouldnt care,
as i made it the past 30y of gaming without it.
and how much content is running above 60Hz in 4K/UHD?
NOTHING except pc gaming, and then only for some that are interested in higher fps, but usually dont play at 4K.
The consoles are doing 60 as well, so no need to really go higher.
and why would Nv care to support anything but vsync/gsync?
when was the last time amd supported gsync...
and any made made product will eventually be "obsolete.
the only difference is time/cost, and there are enough ppl that dont mind to
spend a certain amount of money to get that kind of screen with given performance
and much lower input lag (as most is coming from tvs processing the signal for picture improvements)..
dfsdfs1112
alanm
stuff like this or this.
Have you heard of TCL TVs? They are a Chinese company that often get good ratings at rting.com
Are they Samsung or LG premium quality? No, but not the main point being made. Are they as capable as Nvidia can be if they wanted to do this? NO and THAT is the point.
Thats why I said Any electronics company can "make" displays or TVs in quotation marks. The quality aspect has not been alluded to or implied across the board to all manufacturers or assemblers. Size? This gets into traditional TV territory. And if the earlier mentioned TCL, a cheap Chinese brand, does well enough to get good reviews at rting.com, then Nvidia whose expertise is graphics and image reproduction from products that interface with displays (and TVs), can certainly pull this off on a better level.
Bla bla bla... seems your anti-Nvidia stance is really whats behind your postings and is why you cant accept them getting into new areas such as display tech. They are tech and resource rich enough to pull something like this off. But it cannot be done on a subpar level if they want to succeed with this. If you want to argue that "maximizing their profits by hundreds of percent" (exaggerate much?) must exclude other areas of development that can fit in well with their business model and field of expertise, then OK, noted (as well as your overt antipathy for the company that must taint your argument by default).
Have you heard of Wasabi or Crossover displays? They are tiny companies that can pull off dfsdfs1112
alanm
Always get a kick out of the classic kids argument "hey, you're wrong because I say so" with zero evidence to back it up. I will take rting.com results over what you say any day of the week. Have fun wallowing in your "I hate Nvidia therefore they cannot make BF displays" stance all you want.
dfsdfs1112
fry178
@alanm
samsung made a deal with hisense and tcl to provide them (at least) with panels, maybe even tvs.
@dfsdfs1112
to use my STW voice: no clue you have, young padawan.
the source (usb/internet/BD/UHD-BR) has NOTHING to do with image quality.
resolution and bitrate (amongst other things) DOES.
i have vids i use for demos, no not brand specific demos, but movies/games and even files with "streaming quality" comparable to netflix/amazon/hulu etc,
and most of the time customers dont even realize the content runs at "1-step" lower resolution or that its online (vs disc).
so far only you have posted stuff without any proof, especially when i have ppl buy 3000-8000$ tvs,
when they could get one for 1000-2000$, if there was not real difference...
and the nice part about synthetic test? they can be applied to any screen and results are easily comparable between different models/brands etc.
does 3Dmark make a good game/gpu test? no, but it lets me compare the relative computing power between different cards,
and if its 20% faster, its 20% faster, no matter if the test is synthetic or not.
dfsdfs1112
fry178
Lol, all processing is done by the processor independently from input.
And there is no signal that has more than RGB colors, no matter the source.
Besides that, all colors combined make white, and does NOT require a special signal,
and is the same for all tvs or monitors no matter the brand.
WRGB only applies to (LG) oleds, and no other screen tech, and i dont even consider oleds to be superior, except black levels when watching movies in a dark room.
And you even said it yourself: all content only has 3 colors, so playing it thru different input will not change that, period.
Fact is, the lcd based sony Z9D produces almost the same blacks while keeping the brightness of leds.
And upscaling is only done on signals with non-native res, again, no matter source.
Might wanna read up on stuff..
yasamoka
dfsdfs1112
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/asus-and-acer-uhd-g-sync-hdr-monitors-forced-to-use-color-compression-at-120144-hz.html
To all the publicity people of
NVIDIA
, addicted to the nonsense of
NVIDIA
Read and cry how they work on you !!!
" when using a high refresh rate, the image quality dropped significantly. "
" DisplayPort 1.4 has too little bandwidth available to drive 4k, 144 Hz without compression "
" There's no real solution for this, other than new display connectors and graphics cards that do support such high bandwidth connections - HDMI 2.1. "
alanm
alanm
---
dfsdfs1112
fry178
Seems you dont understand the difference between what the "maker" is able to "do" and what they have no control over.
Please explain how it is Nvidias fault that connections are laggig "behind" in capabilities and are the bottlenecking part.
Guess you will also blame car makers for the fact that they make cars that can exceed the legal speed limits, instead of the driver.
Or would you complain to Bentleys/Rolls Roys about ride quality, if you're driving on a rural unpaved road?
Its clear you're ignoring the facts disproving your statements , and as i have yet to see anything from you that doesn't read like "i hate NV",
you're less believable with every post.
nizzen
This forum i getting worse every year.
Too much trolls, whiners and people that think they know something, but they don't...
Ricepudding
Fediuld