NVIDIA also announces RTX 2080 Super: available from July 23
Click here to post a comment for NVIDIA also announces RTX 2080 Super: available from July 23 on our message forum
Neo Cyrus
I'm getting "error story does not exist".
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Administrator
I added an extra server, however, it is in write-only mode and has not picked up the latest news stories. You'll bounce around the different servers and inevitably you'll load the content until load/traffic normalizes and the primary server back kicks in.
Okay, that was way more explaining, then I had in my head to answer š
Tellthetruth
Hey Hillbert, when you have the card in your hands and disassemble it, could you take note of the memory chips part number? IĀ“m very curious about that "15.5 Gbps". Is a very strange number, so, so they exist? Could it be a 16 Gbps part clocked down?, 14 Gbps overclocked?
SniperX
(Memory clock * 2) / 1000 = Memory data rate
(7751 * 2) / 1000 = 15.5Gbps
Most likely these are the exact same memory modules as before, so yes, overclocked...
Loophole35
If this is true I would not touch this card with at 10' pole.
Tellthetruth
I know how memory data rate works, just asked if 14 OC or 16 DC when the card arrives. Until then all are conjectures. But yes, is probably as you say, a 14 OC....
illrigger
The earlier articles from WCCFTech said that unlike the previous boards, nVidia is not requiring the VRMs to be standardized. So while the FE card will be kinda meh (albeit even a 5% improvement at the same cost is nothing to sneeze at), OEM cards will likely be able to pull higher OCs and more stability out of their high-end boards.
The real question is when it is the 2080 Ti Super coming?
NCC1701D
I think that's the card all the 1080 Ti owners want so that they can buy the reg 2080 Ti for cheaper. Still, the reg 2080 Ti would probably still cost 900 bucks really late into this gens life cycle and the 2080 Ti Super would be well over a grand. I'm fine with lowering settings on my 1080 Ti and waiting to see what prices/performance the next gen brings. Just can't see myself ever paying 1000+ dollars for a graphics card. Games are pretty at Ultra Settings and high res, but they ain't worth no 1300 dollars. We need some good competition in the top-tier to keep these prices in check going forward.
Megabiv
This may very well get me to move away from my 980ti sli setup. Depending of prices of course. Otherwise I might just keep saving for a 3k series. Kind of wish they did a GTX variant with the horse power of these but no rtx parts that I don't want to pay for.
JamesSneed
Unless you are in a dire need I would wait for big Navi and 3K series. We should have a decent jump in performance with those.
Astyanax
big navi won't be competitive with ampere, it'll compete with high end turing.
Astyanax
reference vrms were only required on the non-A equipped boards.
Fox2232
Again, you present assumptions as reality.
fantaskarsef
I more and more think that fellow gurus are right, like I read in other threads, this is only to keep people buying cards late in the cycle. Even if they'll ever release a 2080TI Super, sure as hell I'm not buying it but rather save my money for Ampere if so. Unless upgrading from older cards, this "refresh" (I guess fab yields improve and that's why those cards even exist) is probably not even worth considering to anybody with a Turing card and maybe even not Pascal cards.
Astyanax
Keep telling yourself those sweet lies, it is you that suffer from reality substitution.
I bet you also believe Intel Xe will be competitive with Ampere at launch.
Fox2232
No my dear. I do not deal with beliefs. I do not do religions, nor delusions.
I know difference between probability and certainty. I do not use May and Will interchangeably. You do. You behave like some kind of prophet. Making claims as if you knew while you only believe you know.
- - - -
And as for that dumb bet. You owe me whatever you was willing to bet. What's that? A lot? Or nothing? Either way, that's exactly how much you yourself know that your claims are worth.
So, either say that you owe me nothing for lost bet as you backed your bet/claims by nothing. Or deliver that value you put on your claims.
Astyanax
You're a pretty poor troll.
Fox2232
Not a troll. Logic! You made another of your baseless claims. Backed it by bet which you automatically lost.
So, what did you back your claim by? I expect that by nothing. But you may surprise me and value your own empty claims.
= = = =
I am not trolling you. I want you to stop making empty claims. And start making clear distinctions between reality and assumptions. It is not that hard to know what you do not know.
Distinction is easy. Reality is touchable now. What you assume is what you made up in your mind... as fiction or other virtual construct.
HeavyHemi
As I see it, he was expressing his opinion. Likely true given the current state between AMD and Nvidia. And no, you can stomp your feet but I'm not going to validate my opinion for you. Since when does every opinion posted require supporting documentation or evidence? I'm certain you don't hold yourself to that standard.
Fox2232
Opinions would be following:
There is hard line between calling someone idiot and questioning someone's mental capabilities. He makes hard statements. Like calling someone idiot. While I recognize that he does not have capacity to do so and at best he may question someone's mental capability.
I came to conclusion that he is native speaker, likely form US form what he posted over time. Someone like that should make clear distinction between "may happen" and "will happen". And I am sure, you are able to make that distinction too.
But he in particular makes those (baseless) statements very often and often reassures others that that's reality.
