New Photos of GeForce GTX Titan X

#5025473

kanej2007

2015-03-08 09:16

Wow, that's a monster gpu!

#5025482

Glasofruix

2015-03-08 10:06

And they've kept the most useless an noisiest cooling system...

#5025486

Spets

2015-03-08 10:16

And they've kept the most useless an noisiest cooling system...

What? The titan cooler is actually pretty damn good for reference.

#5025499

Hozza

2015-03-08 11:51

I hope when it goes to retail it has a backplate.

#5025503

moab600

2015-03-08 12:01

I wonder, nVidia knows that the 390X will cost approx 700$ and probably offer similar or lower performance, this titan does not have FP64 like Kepler counterparts. So what make it special besides 12GB? full GM200 yep, i wonder if nVidia implemented something devilish again.

#5025505

CalculuS

2015-03-08 12:04

And they've kept the most useless an noisiest cooling system...

Its not that noisy. http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_titan_z_review,10.html

#5025514

kaingr

2015-03-08 12:41

if u oc its gonna get noisy if not unbearable

#5025515

NAMEk

2015-03-08 12:50

I wonder, nVidia knows that the 390X will cost approx 700$ and probably offer similar or lower performance, this titan does not have FP64 like Kepler counterparts. So what make it special besides 12GB? full GM200 yep, i wonder if nVidia implemented something devilish again.

No FP64? 🙁

#5025517

CalculuS

2015-03-08 12:58

if u oc its gonna get noisy if not unbearable

Following that logic every graphics card gets noisy.

#5025521

Spets

2015-03-08 13:15

Single GPU with titan cooler is pretty good. It's not the 290x reference cooler 😉 http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_titan_review,11.html

#5025522

SoloCreep

2015-03-08 13:19

I will be surprised if this is under 4,000. I'm going to guess it will be 4,000-5,000. It could be even more really. The Quadro K6000 is still over 4,000 and the TitanX is a better card. I don't do CGI for movies and I don't make video games so I will never own one of these moster cards 😉

#5025526

Texter

2015-03-08 13:29

Holy f@cking crap it's Sunday...

#5025534

Undying

2015-03-08 13:52

Here in Europe original Titan cost as much as 980 atm. Not to mention Black or Z. I can only imagine how this thing will cost, lol.

#5025535

holystarlight

2015-03-08 13:52

hot damn, that's one sexy card, I cant wait for its release and hopefully waterblocks will follow quickly,

#5025543

Lane

2015-03-08 14:16

It’s the most advanced GPU the world has ever seen,”

Jen Hsun should stop to touch itself. I ask me what he will said about the AMD R9 390x lol...

No FP64? 🙁

Its the rumor based on a Japanese conference from Nvidia, this said i could imagine the gpu could get 1/8 - 1/16 FP64 rate vs the 1/32 rate of GM204.. ( they will never approach the 1/2 FP64 rate of AMD anyway ).. The problem is i ask me what will be the difference with a 980-990TI based on GM200. spec suggest that the only difference could just be the 12Gb vs 6GB on the non Titan version. ( maybe with 1-2SMX disabled on first iteration quickly followed by an new version ( as i really doubt with some SMX disabled the gpu could be competitive). If the only difference is the memory stack doubled, im not sure it will justify the cost.

#5025549

RavenMaster

2015-03-08 14:22

I think £800 (VAT included) would be a fair price considering its spec. Looks like its performance will be around +50% more than a GTX980. If it costs anymore than that when its released, I won't be buying it. I'll instead wait for 2x GTX1080's

#5025566

Denial

2015-03-08 15:18

I will be surprised if this is under 4,000. I'm going to guess it will be 4,000-5,000. It could be even more really. The Quadro K6000 is still over 4,000 and the TitanX is a better card. I don't do CGI for movies and I don't make video games so I will never own one of these moster cards 😉

The Quadro comes with professional support from Nvidia, which is why it's so expensive. This doesn't. At most this will be $1500. I'm expecting it to come closer to $1000. It's only 30% larger then a 980.

#5025580