Mini LED based ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX available end of June 2021
Click here to post a comment for Mini LED based ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX available end of June 2021 on our message forum
Andy Watson
And then I saw the price.....
RED.Misfit
A little bit too expensive.
You can get a nice Samsung Neo QLED for that price (double the size for the same price)
I know, it's a big TV and not a gaming monitor. And that's my point, it's more or less a bigger PG32UQX without a few gimmick OSD things but it should be roughly equal to it. Someone is having a nice margin on its product.
Ricepudding
Monitors have become the biggest joke, for the fact i could get 3 LG CX OLED's for the same price makes me laugh, who cares about possible burn in when chances are its still going to be cheaper!
I keep looking to update my monitor the PG279Q that i got about 5/6 years ago for £550, monitors haven't gone down in price since then they have only gone up by crazy amounts, even the new asus one that is meant to replace this one is a cool £700-800, with some very minor updates. honestly if LG ever release a 35inch OLED around these price brackets no one will look at a monitor heck people are aleady looking at TVs now as they're just so much cheaper
Inquisitor
Wow that price! I'll stick with my PG279Q then, still a great monitor and has served me well! It's not like my 1080ti could handle this beast anyway
Dragam1337
I just want a 4k 165+ hz monitor with g-sync and very low latency, and displayport 2.0 or hdmi 2.1. I dont want local dimming, and i dont care about HDR, both of which makes the price explode.
JamesSneed
I would love this in a 27" 144Hz+ 1440P monitor. The extra contrast would be wonderful in darker games but without the burn in issues OLED brings. The cost of mini LED backlights isn't that much so this price will come down over time especially as other vendors make competing products. I certainly wont be early adopting but a mini LED backlight monitor is going to be bought in the next couple years.
Dragam1337
Lol you want this monitor, except you want a 27" 1440p monitor...
SamuelL421
So I spent maybe $1200-1300 USD on an Acer 4k 32" gysnc IPS back in early 2016... at the time, and even now, that feels like an absurd amount to spend on monitor. It's not a direct comparison since it was IPS and limited to 60hz gysnc... that said, it does showcase some outrageous price creep for very little improvement in technology/quality.
illrigger
What? It only 3.5 kiloeuros. :P
RavenMaster
I very much doubt many people will buy this. Even if it were cheaper it's still missing HDMI 2.1 and in this day and age where we have PS5 and XBSX, that's just not an option.
JamesSneed
LOL yeah. Same everything else which I know the panel is kind of a big peace:)
SplashDown
Why G-Sync not what everybody thought it was? Or more than likely, it's not working like it should or thought it should.
Loobyluggs
HDMI 2.0
This is not the monitor we are looking for...
deusex
Price should not be more than $1,500.
Just go get yourself nice OLED TV for less than half the price.
metagamer
Three and a half grand for a 32" screen. And people say OLED is expensive. F*ck off Asus. Honestly, if you have money to burn because you're playing Premier League football, this might be alright, but otherwise, this is a joke.
metagamer
Big fail on this, for obvious reasons. You'd expect them to give a flying f*ck and have 2.1 onboard. But no. That will come next year, for a measly 4,000 smackaroos.
Whiplashwang
I can buy an LG 48inch OLED, try to cause as much burn-in as possible, then buy another and still not reach the outrageous price of the PG32UQX. Complete asinine!
Neo Cyrus
3.5K EU...
Loobyluggs
Go to the monitor section of these forums and you will see my choice in big beautiful colors
Moonbogg
You can't blame them for charging so much because people voted with their wallets with the previous 4K FALD monitors that were $2000. Then people bought the ultrawide version for $2500, so why not charge $3500 for this? Obviously they aren't charging enough because people have no issue buying them. Maybe most of us aren't rich enough to be a high-end PC gamer anymore. I think high-end PC gaming these days is really for a tiny fraction of people with an absolute crap-ton of money to throw around. $3500 is approaching the price of a decent used car, so no one spending that much on a monitor cares about the price at all. They'd just as easily spend twice that. There's no other explanation for that price. Anyone who is price conscious in any way won't be spending $3500 on a 32" screen.
