#5773846

SaiBork

2020-03-27 09:17

240Hz and cheap because it's only a Full HD (1920x1080) display

#5773849

Roger_D25

2020-03-27 09:29

As I read the description I kept wondering to myself why it was so cheap, thanks for the heads up SaiBork!

#5773927

thesebastian

2020-03-27 14:45

This looks line my current LG 27GL850-B But with 1080p instead 1440p and 240Hz instead 144Hz. The one I have is not true HDR. But has an acceptable HDR, very good SDR brightness and amazing colours. Works perfectly with G-Sync. The 1MS is a marketing move in my model, but still one of the fatest IPSs and has sufficient low latency for 144Hz (from what I understood).

#5774149

Shaxuul

2020-03-28 04:18

Meh, I just can't get excited about "1080p" in 2020. Too underwhelming now. Time to move on passed it, like we did with 1680x1050.

#5774296

gx-x

2020-03-28 18:18

You can move past it , for $600 and up. But your GPU (your signature) can't push 60 fps @1080, let alone anything higher.

#5774312

valentyn0

2020-03-28 19:10

thesebastian:

This looks line my current LG 27GL850-B But with 1080p instead 1440p and 240Hz instead 144Hz. The one I have is not true HDR. But has an acceptable HDR, very good SDR brightness and amazing colours. Works perfectly with G-Sync. The 1MS is a marketing move in my model, but still one of the fatest IPSs and has sufficient low latency for 144Hz (from what I understood).

It looks like 27GL850-B but it's not. that panel has true IPS colors and dci-p3 up to 98 % (incorporated variant in Lenovo y27q-20) The 1ms is actually 3ms real with normal timings but if you go for extreme overdrive it reaches 1ms but you wont like what you'll see.

#5774698

Jespi

2020-03-30 10:40

How the fck isn´t 1920x1080 dead already?

#5774775

Venix

2020-03-30 14:03

Jespi:

How the fck isn´t 1920x1080 dead already?

Buckle up 1080 p would be the dominant resolution for at least few more years !