LG EA93 21:9 UltraWide Monitor

Published by

Click here to post a comment for LG EA93 21:9 UltraWide Monitor on our message forum
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/178/178868.jpg
Looks beautiful! What is the resolution of the monitor? There are no specifications listed unfortunately.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224952.jpg
Yeah it looks like a really nice display, the dual input feature is a good idea. But again, misleading claims:
The UltraWide Monitor's 21:9 aspect ratio is very close to the dimensions of movie theater screens. Its cinematic dimensions allow the monitor to display films the way they were intended.
Its no better than a 1080p 16:9 display in this regard, it might be worse. Blu Ray movies wont suddenly play back at higher res. A 1080p 16:9 display will give you the same Blu Ray picture but will be able to do it pixel for pixel, it will have black borders above and below, but they are black, they dont matter. There may be aliasing on the 21:9 due to stretching of some pixels and not others, to fit the extra pixels along the screens width. It will be interesting to see how it handles this.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/238/238545.jpg
Looks beautiful! What is the resolution of the monitor? There are no specifications listed unfortunately.
Should of gone to specsavers. The spec sheet is at the bottom of the article 2560*1080
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/178/178868.jpg
Should of gone to specsavers. The spec sheet is at the bottom of the article 2560*1080
Lol, dam, I actually didn't see the spec sheet below. Nevertheless it's nice being 2560x1080. And yeah, I might check out Specsavers. 😀
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/180/180832.jpg
Moderator
29 inch @ 2560x1080 do not want. wish it was a 24" though
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/229/229509.jpg
that's an odd resolution. give me 16:10 any day.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/241/241601.jpg
well it shure is gonna be interesting and inovative.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/204/204717.jpg
that's an odd resolution. give me 16:10 any day.
This, plus more pixels. I love pixels.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/115/115616.jpg
It may be actually pretty good for simracing.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/199/199386.jpg
Yeah it looks like a really nice display, the dual input feature is a good idea. But again, misleading claims: Its no better than a 1080p 16:9 display in this regard, it might be worse. Blu Ray movies wont suddenly play back at higher res. A 1080p 16:9 display will give you the same Blu Ray picture but will be able to do it pixel for pixel, it will have black borders above and below, but they are black, they dont matter. There may be aliasing on the 21:9 due to stretching of some pixels and not others, to fit the extra pixels along the screens width. It will be interesting to see how it handles this.
I think you're wrong. A bluray picture has borders because it's been horizontally constrained because of the display it has been playing on. Ofc, if you were to play a 1920x1080 picture on it, it'll have to digitally zoom and pixelate it, but I'm not convinced blue ray is 1920x1080 - I always figured they were 21:9/2560x1080 that the lower resolution displays were scaling back 25% to fit the width because they lack the 21:9 display and were just doing the best the could with what they got. btw, Dell are gonna be using this panel, according to tftcentral, so we'll see which drops the price info first.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/198/198461.jpg
It could be very nice for wide FOV / FPS gaming on single monitor. Similar to having dual monitor setup but without bezels in the way. Though I'd rather 27" 2560x1440.
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
I think you're wrong. A bluray picture has borders because it's been horizontally constrained because of the display it has been playing on. Ofc, if you were to play a 1920x1080 picture on it, it'll have to digitally zoom and pixelate it, but I'm not convinced blue ray is 1920x1080 - I always figured they were 21:9/2560x1080 that the lower resolution displays were scaling back 25% to fit the width because they lack the 21:9 display and were just doing the best the could with what they got. btw, Dell are gonna be using this panel, according to tftcentral, so we'll see which drops the price info first.
Er no. The Blu-ray spec for full HD is 1080p.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/220/220188.jpg
blu rays are 1080p yea but the original movie normally is 21:9 or something like that, i would like a 2560x1200 instead why not 21:10? is a desktop monitor after all not an HDTV, but i really like the looks haha thats reeeally wide dude (:
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/80/80129.jpg
I'd rather see 4k 24" monitors with IPS/120Hz but yeah, the thin bezel is pretty nice looking.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/199/199386.jpg
Er no. The Blu-ray spec for full HD is 1080p.
With black borders for movies.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224952.jpg
Yep, covered that in post #3. Otherwise the blu ray film would need to be 16:9 or 16:10, not 21:9. They are after promotional points, its a shame that their method can detract from the quality.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/71/71182.jpg
Someone should photoshop it, and make it look wider. Personally i think it's a bit ridiculous.
data/avatar/default/avatar32.webp
With black borders for movies.
There is a bit of conflating of Bluray aspect ratio (1.77:1) and the aspect ratio of the source material. Common ratios used in theaters are 1.85:1 and 2.39:1. Of course to avoid cropping the image they use letter boxing to utilize the full width of the screen.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/199/199386.jpg
There is a bit of conflating of Bluray aspect ratio (1.77:1) and the aspect ratio of the source material. Common ratios used in theaters are 1.85:1 and 2.39:1. Of course to avoid cropping the image they use letter boxing to utilize the full width of the screen.
I know some well known films were shot in 1.85:1, like saving private ryan, but really 2.4:1 or thereabouts, like matrix, lord of the rings trilogy, batman trilogy, is really the standard, and this scales to 21:9, because it's really 2.33:1. I find it funny that as teevees were originally 4:3, movie studios got scared and decided to give something you couldn't get at home, and here we are all these years later and teevees still have issues with these ratios.
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/224/224952.jpg
Except they dont have issues. What issues are you on about?