Japanese Company Designs 133 Megapixel sensor for 8K recordings

Published by

Click here to post a comment for Japanese Company Designs 133 Megapixel sensor for 8K recordings on our message forum
#4819581
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
we dont even have 4k wide spread hell neither is 2k and they already try 8k apparently tech advance faster then the ability for the tech to even see light of day to the masses. will 10k be announced by the time 2k becomes standard and widely available, and 12k by time 4k is? Hell i still wating on oLED it announced how long ago? it the only tech that bring back response time to on par with crt as far as current led/lcd to goes. which what bother me about led/lcd tech to begin with. great accomplishment none the less, be more impressed when it actual something more then accomplishment and is actual something widely available to the consumer. like so many other techs announced
#4819625
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/199/199386.jpg
we dont even have 4k wide spread hell neither is 2k and they already try 8k apparently tech advance faster then the ability for the tech to even see light of day to the masses. will 10k be announced by the time 2k becomes standard and widely available, and 12k by time 4k is? Hell i still wating on oLED it announced how long ago? it the only tech that bring back response time to on par with crt as far as current led/lcd to goes. which what bother me about led/lcd tech to begin with. great accomplishment none the less, be more impressed when it actual something more then accomplishment and is actual something widely available to the consumer. like so many other techs announced
Captured resolution and projected/displayed/transmitted resolution have never been the same. Look at all the film(s) that 4K cinemas have not caught up to yet. Of course, when they were projected (like the first 90 years of cinema) it was all good. Cutting it down, the more photons you can capture - the better quality image.
#4819640
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/56/56686.jpg
Captured resolution and projected/displayed/transmitted resolution have never been the same. Look at all the film(s) that 4K cinemas have not caught up to yet. Of course, when they were projected (like the first 90 years of cinema) it was all good. Cutting it down, the more photons you can capture - the better quality image.
Like i said tech that is not widely available to the public.
#4819653
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/137/137601.jpg
8k or 4k isn't good due to moviments limited (motion blur issue) and to lack of CRT. 🙁
#4819692
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/114/114613.jpg
Just thought I'd let you know. I am throwing away a perfectly good 21" CRT. It hasn't been used in years.. I sure don't miss how much these things weigh. To the recycling center it goes!
#4819727
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/240/240605.jpg
133 eh? I saw a documentary about space travel the other day and one of the probe orbiting the planets had a 93mp camera. I mean it gotta be other type of technology, but still! :banana:
#4819742
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174929.jpg
Screw 'retina' displays. How about retina capture?
#4819765
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/191/191421.jpg
I don't even want to think of the render times....
#4819805
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/178/178868.jpg
Can you believe how good porn would look if recorded at 8k? 🙂
#4819809
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/174/174929.jpg
Can you believe how good porn would look if recorded at 8k? 🙂
Im not sure any body would look good at that rez
#4819827
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/191/191421.jpg
Im not sure any body would look good at that rez
The higher the definition, the more plastic the women. In the end, you are watching someone have sex with a blow up doll.
#4819953
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/199/199386.jpg
Like i said tech that is not widely available to the public.
Erm, not sure what you are referring to then - you talking about home cinema, DLSR's?
#4820029
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/149/149159.jpg
I already mentioned this a long time ago that 4k is just a stepping stone like 720p and that Full UHD is 8k.
#4820035
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/134/134194.jpg
My thoughts are how much GPU power and ram and CPU power would we need to game at 8k I am loving 1080p contemplaiting 4k in the future but could it be short lived and 8k is the real future of gaming
#4820088
data/avatar/default/avatar27.webp
Why is everyone so surprized? Heck even a galaxy note 3 has ability to film in 4K.
#4820132
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
higher resolution doesnt automatically mean better pic quality. just compare your cellphone video in FHD to a 720/30p recording of a 5000$ DSLR/lens combo. and if people would really "think" about the cost and hardware involved to have 8K. we dont even get BD quality as cable signal, do you really think the broadcasting companys will stream 1 channel in 8K or 150 in HD?! just because the Bugatti Veyron has 1000HP and can go past 230mph, doesnt mean every driver on this planet needs one.
#4820160
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/251/251033.jpg
The higher the better, but it all really comes down to application. I'm 100% happy with my 1080p 50" Pioneer KURO 500M monitor. Only a handful of monitors can top the image quality, despite being 6 years old... The only time I'll consider upgrading is when a 50" monitor/TV can deliver the KURO's blacks & colors at 144Hz at 4K+ resolution. Otherwise I really don't give two ****s about the awful ISP monitors all you guys own: image quality is the only thing that really matters, if you don't have that then gg.
#4820178
data/avatar/default/avatar22.webp
The higher the better, but it all really comes down to application. I'm 100% happy with my 1080p 50" Pioneer KURO 500M monitor. Only a handful of monitors can top the image quality, despite being 6 years old... The only time I'll consider upgrading is when a 50" monitor/TV can deliver the KURO's blacks & colors at 144Hz at 4K+ resolution. Otherwise I really don't give two ****s about the awful ISP monitors all you guys own: image quality is the only thing that really matters, if you don't have that then gg.
LOL wut Yeah because IPS monitors deliver peanuts when we're gaming / whatever. Not image quality.
#4822278
https://forums.guru3d.com/data/avatars/m/242/242134.jpg
@acidsnow the X900/950 series from sony beats any plasmas black and color. run some color banding tests on your plasma and you realise how "bad" it looks, compared to what the 4K sonys do. compare the color gamut from your plasma to the triluminos. still a plasma fan?! ;-) and as long as your not gaming on the tv, the 144Hz are useless for cable/movies.