Intel’s Thunderbolt in 2014
Click here to post a comment for Intel’s Thunderbolt in 2014 on our message forum
miffywiffy
Why are we still using bits to advertise speed? It is so misleading...
SirDremor
Because...
...this is not misleading...
...everything is based on this...
...it's the only appropriate way to represent data volume\speeds...
...it's not hard to convert values to other units...
This is not a riddle 🙂
lucidus
Sound good. That bit about power delivery was more interesting to me :P
Anarion
Make it fast enough for external gpu's and things get interesting.
lucidus
TheDeeGee
This is just gonna end up like Firewire.
Aro9
Not until all laptops start using 10Gb Ethernet connectors for sure. Thou external storage has soime speed limitations too, if you have NAS especially. And firewire was good at its time vs usb 2.0.
chilly willy
I'm liking the pc-pc connection that is a great idea. should take all the guesswork out of network shares for people that have trouble with that kind of stuff. I could make a super cheap NAS box too using that. Would also be good for Devices you don't want connected to the internet too. And would elimiate the need for multiple NICs and crossover ethernet cables as well.
As far as adoption of Thunderbolt is concerned though it might have a problem since you need an addin card or more expensive motherboards to even use it. Same problem Firewire had in the beginning. Saying that USB 3.1 with its 10GB/s transfer rates looks very exciting. mainly because it would be backwards compatible and it would be more likely to be adopted since usb is a very popular standard already.
The future of storage is looking exciting my friends with SATA Express and USB 3.1 on the horizon. :banana:
_Jay_
NAMEk