oh cmon intel, this could say a lot about that upcoming full length gaming gpu

The CPU score would be quite interesting if real. 4 vs 8 cores, and not that much behind. Another if is how close to reality the power consumption ratings are.

Raja was probably honest and didnt came to intel with USB stick full of AMD GPU design docs:)

ruthan:

Raja was probably honest and didnt came to intel with USB stick full of AMD GPU design docs:)

Or more realistically he stole everything, and everything just happened to suck when it comes to adapting it to become 1st gen stolen tech. They can't be too obvious about the tech they stole.

Neo Cyrus:

Or more realistically he stole everything, and everything just happened to suck when it comes to adapting it to become 1st gen stolen tech. They can't be too obvious about the tech they stole.

Even while idea would be entertaining, he had no access to RDNA IP.

Kaarme:

The CPU score would be quite interesting if real. 4 vs 8 cores, and not that much behind. Another if is how close to reality the power consumption ratings are.

The boost clocks are quite different - Intel ~4.7GHz, AMD ~4.3GHz, which is understandable due to the difference in number of cores. But I still think it is most probably the main cause of the "smaller than expected" gap, also taking into account different boost behavior between Intel and AMD. But as always, no way to know for sure until we get proper benchmarks. On the graphics side, even though we don't see the Graphics score, I think the FPS values speak for themselves.