Intel Skylake CPU and motherboard shipment dates uncovered
Click here to post a comment for Intel Skylake CPU and motherboard shipment dates uncovered on our message forum
Tat3
Good news. Easy for me to push my new build to those dates. The build I have been talking about a year or so at these forums...
On the other hand, I have bought a monitor already (MG279Q). π
fantaskarsef
If only I was impressed with Skylake I'd say it's good news, but still something's happening at least. Hooray for Cannonlake π
Battlefieldprin
I have been itching to upgrade my really old motherboard for a while , hope these cpus bring tangible performance gain.
Laci
HonoredShadow
Same here! Still waiting... π
TheF34RChannel
My motherboard might do with an upgrade as well, get some of those new features π maybe...
xIcarus
Ryu5uzaku
I can just push my upgrade to 2016 π―
amit
Why I ain't excited at all? boring news. monopoly hurts here.
besides, i m excited about my upgrade from HD5970 to 980 ti.
lucidus
I might have upgraded but GTA 5 and Batman AK have come and gone, there's nothing I'm particularly looking forward to playing this year. I don't think I'll be upgrading for that reason.
fantaskarsef
TheF34RChannel
Well like I said, people could just be wanting a more recent motherboard and features, start a anew and such.
f4nm4n
Shadowdane
Intel has really stagnated in the desktop CPU market. They really shouldβve pushed for a 6-core CPU for the i7-6700K. Granted the majority of their sales now are mobile chips. So I'm not really surprised they have been mostly focusing on improving efficiency and power usage.
The only thing that could maybe make be upgrade to Skylake is if they are amazing overclockers. My 4770K hits a brick wall at 4.4Ghz, no matter how much voltage I try it isnβt 100% stable. So I had to settle for 4.3Ghz at 1.25v.
xIcarus
Denial
http://techreport.com/r.x/radeon-r9-fury-x/b3d-bandwidth.gif
Current maximum bandwidth is actually only 387GB/s. I'm not sure if that's due to the ROP count or some other DX11 limitation, random texture is still higher than Nvidia, so I personally think the ROP count is interfering here. Regardless it's not coming close to the theoretical maximum on HBMv1.
But again, all this being said, I don't think AMD had a choice. They couldn't have released a competitive GDDR5 card. They might as well cut their losses as much as possible, get the move to HBM out of the way, get some experience with it and move forward with a die shrink + hopefully new architecture next year.
Well -- a few things.
I don't think AMD could have released a card without HBM that's competitive with Nvidia. It's not like they would have had a new architecture if they pushed HBM back a year. If they had gone GDDR5, you would have got a Fury X Fiji chip, with a 315w TDP instead of 275 and it would have performed slightly worse.
I don't think HBM will be overclockable at all in the near future. Partner companies like EVGA/MSI/ASUS/Etc all recycle GPU cores for RMA purposes if a memory module gets burned out. I haven't looked recently but I know in the past that GDDR DRAM failure is like the highest cause of RMA problems with cards. Now that HBM is integrated onto the interposer, you can no longer recycle the chip if it fails. I also think that due to the nature of manufacturing HBM with over 10K micro connections per stack, the voltage tolerances are probably a lot more strict vs the more robust GDDR. Couple all this with how fast HBM is, I don't even think overclocking is necessary.
I don't know about what the boxes say but actual bandwidth numbers are actually even lower than 480GB/s.
chispy
LBJM
http://forums.guru3d.com/showpost.php?p=5106519&postcount=7).
It's a worthy upgrade. If you have any problem with drivers (i.e. games crashing) install the 350.12 drivers they fixed my trouble moded inf can be found here (tsunami231
well in 3 months i will start price my new pc build , and see if i actual pull the trigger this time
TheF34RChannel