Intel Releases a few Perf Numbers on ARC 750 Graphics card; up to 17% faster than RTX 3060
Click here to post a comment for Intel Releases a few Perf Numbers on ARC 750 Graphics card; up to 17% faster than RTX 3060 on our message forum
fantaskarsef
Numbers aren't bad I guess. Still, it depends on time, and if you need a BAR system to even get there.
Embra
Good enough starting point.
schmidtbag
That is reasonable performance for both the drivers and architecture being un-optimized. I won't be getting it though, simply because the next generation is bound to be significantly better. Intel has a tendency to prematurely abandon fresh products, especially for Windows. Next gen should be a bit more trustworthy.
ulyxon
Have they used bench with raytracing options enabled?
Undying
At 225W my generation old 2080super would destroy this numbers. That is not so great. Driver issues?
sykozis
There is supposed to be at least 1 more card above this one, an A770....but this isn't really a bad start for a company that hasn't produced a real GPU in over 20 years.....
chispy
Not bad for their 1st gpu . I suppose with more mature drivers it will gain a bit more performance.
Aura89
2080 super had a 250 watt, and peaked at..270-280 if i remember correctly?
Not saying your overall sentiment isn't correct, it does seem like high wattage for the outcome, especially since the RTX 3060 which it states it beats but only just, does it around 180 watts or so, and the 3060 ti is less then 210 watts still, both on an older less efficient node.
Guess we'll have to see how the A750 will do in power consumption benchmarks
cucaulay malkin
those numbers are same as 2070 super or better, whose tdp was 215w
it's all a matter of price. 2070S below 300usd would sell really well.
Chert
Not bad. It's performance puts it in between the 3060 and the 3060ti. The A770 should therefore be around the 3070.
cucaulay malkin
and those really aren't some C-grade games either, cp2077 with +15% over 3060
Undying
A770 was supposed to be 3060ti/6700xt competitior. Its not that bad i guess but we should not expect intel competing in the high end.
2080Super is a 250w tdp but it is hovering around 230-240w on average and it peaks at 250w not more than that. A750 is supposed to be 225w tdp so they are close.
0blivious
I think the key is to keep the pricing less than the counterparts from AMD/nvidia. Trying to ask the same money for equal performance with zero track record would likely be a mistake.
mohiuddin
Now price it at 250$.
I might buy one then
Undying
Considering 3060 is above msrp even if intel price a750 299$ it would look like a good deal.
cucaulay malkin
it peaks at 275w for the reference card
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-super-founders-edition/30.html
Undying
I've never seen going that high. Average is around 240w which is right when im playing FC6 for example.
tunejunky
this is far better than i expected.
now we can have a handle on the oem systems that will have these and Intel has the sales channels to completely avoid logistical issues and the marketing to make them immediately competitive.
far more people (not necessarily gamers) know Intel than either AMD or Nvidia and the limited SKU's will help with that (simplicity...good/better/best).
if Sears Roebuck was still around this would be ideal for their brick & mortar. New Egg will do in a pinch.
H83
Not bad, like others have already said.
Now Intel just needs to price the card correctly and launch it before the new gens of Nvidia and AMD.
cucaulay malkin
yeah,
better than we all expected
I wonder what the 4096 shader version does if 3072 is like 2070 Super. 3060ti/6700xt should be beaten.
the arc770 looks sleek af
https://cdn.videocardz.com/1/2022/07/INTEL-ARC770-3.jpg
